I currently run a personal wiki for some notes, recipes, and stuff. It’s set up using Wiki.js as the server. I’m the only regular user, and I feel like it’s a bit of an overkill.

Does someone have any suggestions for a more lightweight wiki server? I tried DokuWiki and mostly like it. But the UI is very old and dare I say, ugly. I love the UI of Wiki.js btw.

My main criteria is that it should be lightweight. I don’t need fancy editing features. Happy to work with raw html or markdown files.

I need some kind of permission management to hide some private wikis from the public, but otherwise I don’t really care.

14 points

I have been using Bookstack, I like it though it is missing a few features I would love:

  • you cannot insert a video in it
  • there is no possibility to comment on a particular text
  • the permissions management is only done with roles. That’s fine generally but I wanted to be able to share a specific page with a specific user, and for that I had to basically create a dedicated role for this use.
permalink
report
reply
4 points

Seconding Bookstack. I’ve embedded videos in it and I don’t recall anything special to do it. I also think there’s a way to comment on specific pages…mostly because I remember disabling that functionality.

Agreed on the roles and permissions aspect though. It’s pretty standard to do that for bigger deployments, but it may be a bit overkill for a single user instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mediawiki

permalink
report
reply
11 points

+1.

And if you truly need lightweight,

Dokuwiki

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I just left Docuwiki for Notion but i used Dokuwiki for almost 10 years and it was perfect for simple documentation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Fossil-scm.org is very lightweight (2mb ram) and does quite a lot. See if you like it.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

That’s pretty neat!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hadn’t heard of it before. Looks promising, thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Fossil looks really cool ! To bad they don’t approve a container setup ! They surely have their reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They don’t? They even ship a Dockerfile, the prebuilt image is just not published on a registry

https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/containers.md

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wow, they really hate the idea that everyone could just spin up a Docker container with their wiki software.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Dokuwiki doesn’t have to look old, it is only the default theme that does. Just install a nicer theme and the Prosemirror addon and it looks and functions like any other modern wiki.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’ve been using silverbullet.md

Its more notes than wiki I guess so depends what you’re after.

permalink
report
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 77K

    Comments