78 points

modder Iamashaymin claimed that footage of Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection that appeared in a trailer suggested that developer Aspyr was using his mod.

Following this, Apsyr released a statement claiming it had “mistakenly” used footage of this mod, and that it was a placeholder. Now, following the full release, players appear to have discovered evidence that prior to a very last-minute patch, the game shipped with the uncredited mod work.

So it looks like its some animation mod. I didn’t research further just read the article. They added it back in apparently using a patch. Scum shit to sell someone’s free labor to the community no matter what it is.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Important context (from the modder):

“I released the source files for my mod for anyone to use, modify, improve however they wish,” iamashaymin said. “If anything I am flattered and joyous they chose to use mine for whatever purpose they needed it for. Ultimately my mod, like all mods, are property of Lucasfilm and they are free to use it how they wish as I have agreed to the license agreement regarding releasing mods created with the Pandemic modding tools.”

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Does the official mod tools include full license assignment or waiver of right to attribution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Apparently. Feels wrong to me unless it’s a very guided process but that’s not rare from what I hear

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But I’ve got all this EA bad circlejerk punt up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-155 points

Well if that ain’t the pot calling the kettle black

permalink
report
reply
107 points

There’s a difference between improving upon other people’s work for free, and taking said improvements and selling them on as your own work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-168 points
*

Mods are not always improvements, but they are always using someone else’s work for free.

If no one is asking you to improve upon other people’s work you have no legal right to do so.

I also agree that they shouldn’t be using the modder’s work without compensation.

I support modding, just be real about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points
*

“Be real” how? I’m legit confused what point you are making. “Using someone’s work for free” doesn’t mean the same as “taking someone’s work and selling it as your own.” When you buy a shirt, you can put your own art on it, but if the shirt company uses your design without credit or consent to sell more shirts, that’s a bit sketchy, no?

I’m gonna “be real” with you, it doesn’t sound like you support modding at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

they are always using someone else’s work for free.

Explain this insanity

You think someone should have to pay to modify the files of a game on their hard drive?

Actually let’s back up. What do you think “modding” means?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

you have no legal right to do so

That’s up for a judge to decide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

you have no legal right to do so

I support modding

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Create post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.8K

    Posts

  • 22K

    Comments