Read the community sidebar before posting anything. All top-level comments (i.e. non-replies) in this thread must be questions. You can also make your own posts in this community if you have more complex questions.

0 points

If anyone has questions about the labor movement or communist history in the United States, ask me, and I can definitely answer.

It’s something of a specialty of mine.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Comrade, all top comments should be questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh, alright. Now I see why my previous comments were deleted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What are your thoughts on organization dues with in potential vanguard parties? – how these dues might be limiting organizational abilities? Does the concept of dues from the proletariat, intrinsically against the mass line approach? I’m firm believer in the mass line approach wherein you need to be organizing the most disenfranchised members of the class society first. If you have to pay $100, $200 in dues every month to an organization is that not negatively impacting our ability to recruit members into an organization? If one can afford $100 a month in additional bills that puts you above a certain amount of people.

Furthermore, doesn’t this method of funding just reproduce the same hierarchy as the systems we intend to dismantle? Many of these organizations have had the same leadership for a decade+, are we funding a vanguard party? – or a vanity effort to get a select group of people elected?

Finally, the idea that the working class members should pay dues to the party, it almost seems like it should be the opposite. It seems like the party should be providing some kind of stipend to its members so that they can be more effectively organizing while reducing the struggles of capitalism. If you’re already struggling day-to-day with capitalism, and then you’re also asked to give another extra $100 on top of that, well now you suddenly have to go, well, do I give my money to the party or do I afford my dog food for the month? Is this counterintuitive to organizing the working class? What are your thoughts?

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Good question. Our party actually works this way. You can become a member for I think 20 euro a year. Then you can become an active member and join a local action group and you will pay something like 5 euro each month. Last, you can become a militant member. You can get education on marxisme through the party and some other extra’s.

Militant members have to give up their pay slips to the party. They will calculate how much you are above the income cap they have set (around 1900 net). You have to give up an amount above that pay and give it to the party. You can choose yourself how much you want to give but I believe they’d actually prefer you give it all. The funding should go to the party and their efforts to organize. Our elected officials do this too. They get paid 11k a month but give most of it to the party to remain an average salary.

Now, I have been thinking about this for a while too. They asked me to become a militant member because they saw potential in me. After a long thought I declined. My salary is above the line but I didn’t feel comfortable donating the extra money I make. I wouldn’t be able to justify it towards my gf and honestly not even towards myself either. I already do a lot of things for the party, from organizing actions to making new members to writing the party program. Life is expensive as it is. A little bit of extra financial security is giving me a lot of mental wellbeing causing me to be able to put in effort for the party.

I think it’s a difficult balance. Our party never reached any position of power for decades. Only since 2019 we have been in Parliament for example. Getting elected in Parliament gave us a budget increase of several millions. Before that our funds had to come from members. Without funds it will be difficult to organize. That’s unfortunately the sad reality of today. I think you do need ways to get the people without the funds and get them to co-operate without paying membership fees. Preferably have the other, more affluent members pay for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Very informative response, thank you. Gotta have cash to work towards abolishing cash I suppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why are the dues $100?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just a number I used for this

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

How does Christianity influenced the defeatist ideology behind the Western leftist? Also, quick question, what does cracker mean? (I am assuming it meant white/western liberal or soon to be fascist)

permalink
report
reply
11 points

https://redsails.org/western-marxism-and-christianity/

required reading for western communists imo

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Cracker is a prejorative for white people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
1 point

Why was this comment deleted?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

There’s a modlog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What does it show?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

This thread is for serous posting only, please read the rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh my bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Socialism 101

!socialism101@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

A community for left-leaning people (including liberals who consider themselves leftists) to ask questions about socialism and socialist countries. Instance rules mostly apply – by necessity, inadvertent violations of rule 1 are allowed.

This community is primarily intended for people from other instances to ask questions, but new Lemmygrad users can also do so.

Rules:

  • Post titles must be questions; off-topic posts will be removed
  • Engage in good faith; hostility will result in a ban (temporary or permanent depending on severity)
  • Don’t respond to hostile comments, just report them
  • Serious questions and replies only
  • Provide sources for any political assertions; comments with uncited claims will be removed
  • Employ media criticism; if an article is not a first-hand account and doesn’t cite any sources of its own, it’s almost certainly unreliable

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 1

    Posts

  • 29

    Comments