41 points

Let’s see how the anti-Biden tankies try to spin this one.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

They probably just won’t recognize any facts that challenge their worldview.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

No comments yet in the World New@lemmy.ml post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You should post it to !news@hexbear.net and really rile them up!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not a fan of them posting pictures of themselves shitting on their own testicles. It’s weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The Russian deputy ambassador to the UN, Dmitry Polyanskiy, warned reporters on Thursday: “We are not satisfied with anything which doesn’t call for an immediate ceasefire.”

He argued that the effect of making a ceasefire conditional on the release of all hostages would be to endorse leaving hundreds of thousands of innocent Palestinian civilians exposed to continued Israeli attacks until the point when Hamas and Isreal reached an agreement.

In the chamber, the Russian ambassador Vasily Nebenzya told the security council the resolution was a “hypocritical spectacle” that put no real pressure on Israel over its war crimes. Moscow also said the episode showed the US administration was more interested in throwing a bone to American voters and persuading a domestic audience it was being even-handed in the crisis. Source

So. Mission Accomplished.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It was a temporary ceasefire proposal, the US has already blocked 3 permanent ceasefire proposals.

Same way Israel has been rejecting every permanent ceasefire for months. Because they prioritize extending genocide in Gaza over the release of hostages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It was still a ceasefire resolution, and one which was vetoed by Russia and China. I await the flood of tankie vitriol for those nations for supporting Israel’s pogrom against the Palestinians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Israel is doing genocide in Gaza. A temporary ceasefire means to allow Israel to continue it’s genocide in Gaza and not cease all hostilities. There is a very big difference between a temporary ceasefire resolution and a permanent ceasefire resolution. That difference is exactly why Israel wants a temporary ceasefire and has rejected all permanent ceasefire proposals.

If you want the genocide to end, you want a permanent ceasefire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m waiting for one of them to comment and go on an unhinged rant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

unhinge these nuts from your mother

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Sad

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Oh yay! Biden is on the same side as Putin and Xi, in disagreement with the rest of the world.

Not quite the win I think you’re going for there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The United Nations Security Council has failed to pass a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza as part of a hostage deal after Russia and China, who are permanent members, voted against the measure proposed by the United States.

It’s literally the first paragraph of the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The US was vetoing ceasefire resolutions before this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Yes, so now ceasefire resolutions have been vetoed by Biden, Putin, and Xi. Good company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

this makes me suspect even more it has been incited by russia as a distraction. i mean the situation was messed up in israel/palestine for like 80 years, but suddenly when russia has problems invading a country, it escalates. coincidence? i doubt it.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I mean Iran is Russia’s link to this shit, and Iran has been distancing the fuck out of their relationship with Hamas since the attack, which implies Hamas jumped the gun, which implies Iran doesn’t have as much control over them as they’d like, which means Russia would have even less ability to direct the action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Mmm. Did Russia even need to incite it, or just toss gasoline on the flames that are already burning?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I doubt it, because their vote doesn’t indicate that Russia or China want to avoid a ceasefire. Russia and China both know that the US would vote against it anyway, which means that their vote won’t alter the situation anyway, so both Russia and China are free to vote in whatever way they think is most politically-appealing; their vote is decoupled from what they want to happen.

You could say that it’s surprising that they wanted the political appearance of opposing a ceasefire, though. I don’t know what considerations factor into that.

EDIT: Oh, wait, this is one that the US proposed, so it’s probably on terms that Israel would accept.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Suddenly? War had been going for quite some time at the moment of Hamas attack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The goal is to weaken west by causing conflict and division.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Has a lot more to do with the brutal occupation.

Both the official reasons and expert analysis don’t suggest that this escalation has anything to do with Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So if the US was vetoing previous ceasefire resolutions, what makes their proposed ceasefire resolution different?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

While the US promoted the measure as calling for a ceasefire, critics pointed out that the draft falls short of demanding an end to the war.

The proposal backs the “imperative” for “an immediate and sustained ceasefire to protect civilians on all sides”, differing from previous draft resolutions vetoed by Washington, which demanded an unconditional ceasefire.

Russia’s ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, said the draft was exceedingly politicised and contained an “effective green light” for Israel to mount a military operation in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah, where more than 1.5 million Palestinians are sheltering.

Nebenzia said there was no call for a ceasefire in the resolution’s text and accused the US leadership of “deliberately misleading the international community”.

China’s representative, Zhang Jun, said the draft “dodged the most central issue, that of a ceasefire” through its “ambiguous” language.

“Nor does it even provide an answer to the question of realising a ceasefire in the short term,” he added. Source

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is it. The proposed resolution didn’t call for a ceasefire. The weasel words fooled nobody.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

For the surprise of 0 people

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I guarantee some of the Jinping cocksuckers on Hexbear are absolutely shocked by this. They were singing his praises when he insulted the USA for enabling a genocide about a month ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Shocked? They will make up a reason why this is good, China and Russia are the saviours of Palestine and US is the root of all evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Seems like every offer that demands that the hostages be released gets rejected. Wonder if that means they don’t have as many living hostages as Israel believes.

Hopefully this can come to a conclusion quickly but it seems like various parties are making that more difficult all around.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Probably more about the condition of the female hostages

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The UN conducted a preliminary investigation and found clear and convincing evidence of rape, gang rape, sexualized torture, and even sex with the corpses. Just think about that for moment and imagine what those poor female hostages are almost certainly going through right now. Disgusting. Hamas is the absolute scum of the earth.

From the UN report:

Based on the information it gathered, the mission team found clear and convincing information that sexual violence, including rape, sexualized torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment has been committed against hostages and has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing against those still held in captivity. In line with a survivor/victim-centered approach, findings are conveyed in generic terms and details are not revealed.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and other armed groups against civilian and military targets throughout the Gaza periphery, the mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations during the 7 October attacks, including rape and gang-rape in at least three locations, namely: the Nova music festival site and its surroundings, Road 232, and Kibbutz Re’im. In most of these incidents, victims first subjected to rape were then killed, and at least two incidents relate to the rape of women’s corpses.

https://www.un.org/sexualviolenceinconflict/press-release/israel-west-bank-mission/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dude, you are a horrible human being.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments