The intimacy ban that had been in place for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics has been lifted for the 2024 Paris Olympics, and the Olympic village, where the athletes stay during the event, will be stocked with 300,000 condoms, Laurent Michaud, director of the village, told Sky News.

In an interview about the upcoming games, which will be held in the French capital from July 26 to Aug. 11, Michaud said they are preparing for 14,250 residents at the village and are aiming to have 300,000 condoms for the athletes.

Rules on intimacy went into effect for the 2020 Olympics that were held in Tokyo, Japan in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To help prevent the virus from spreading, athletes were asked to limit their physical contact with each other, keeping about six and a half feet between them, except when necessary, like on the field.

Providing condoms at the Olympics has been a tradition since the 1988 Seoul Olympics, as an effort to raise awareness for HIV and AIDS, according to CBS Sports. In Tokyo, officials still handed out 150,000 condoms – even though the intimacy rules prevented any scenarios to use them.

6 points
*

There was an intimacy ban?

Did anyone tell the athletes?

From what I heard there’s quite a lot of intimacy that was already a well established tradition at the Olympic villages.

permalink
report
reply
76 points

Young athletes in their prime under extreme tension and stress. Yep nothing to see here, absolutely no sex will happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Especially when you consider that atheletes tend to be unattractive, have poor body shapes, no confidence. Definitely no sex going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Wtf did I do to you!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Not to mention most of them are used to consuming way more calories then the average human and doing intense workouts that they then stop doing during s competition. That energy needs to release somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

“What’s your most memorable moment from the Olympics?”

“Uhhhh… You know, the… competition.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

“14,250 residents…300,000 condoms”.

So, 20 per resident.

permalink
report
reply
160 points

From what I’ve read previously, I’m not sure that’s enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

I imagine they’re expecting some athletes to bring their own, free condoms tend to suck.

I also imagine some people will go without by choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“it’s more aerodynamic”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

you used to be able to get proper branded Durex condoms for free in health centres in the UK with flavoured and ribbed varieties if you were under 18.

Then the boomers complained and they changed it so you could only get the “extra safe” ones which made it so you could barely feel anything.

So naturally me and my gf at the time stopped using them entirely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

free condoms tend to suck

They are literally made in the exact same factory with the exact same material. The only difference is marketing and some custom molds for like, ribbed, ultra thin, etc. Almost all brands in the world share the same dozen or so factories.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They run out every Olympics

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

They’re Olympics branded condoms, people scoop them up as souvenirs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

This is so French.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Those are all expired!!! Conspiracy to create superior athletic humans?

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Yes. It was started by the Nazis at their Olympics, when they sought to breed out some supersoldiers. All the major powers agreed and it has been an unofficial rule ever since.

Edit: Ok, actually I’m lying. It was started by the Greco-Roman Olympics, when they sought to breed out some demigods. All the major powers agreed and so Asterix and Obelix were born.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Olympics in old Greece were only men, all naked no? How would that work out haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They didn’t say it was a good idea

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m thinking about the tier list.

“Sprinter? No lol. No thanks.”

I’d have to guess there are socioeconomic groupings as well. The rowers probably have the upper hand there, along with anything involving firearms or horses.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Wait, why firearms?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Honestly, it was a guess, based less on US socioeconomics, and more globally. In a lot of countries, shooting involves a lot of red tape that’s easier to wade through with a boatload of money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Oh… I misread your comment and thought you were ranking them based on sexual performance based on their sport.

Like, rowers have great thighs and arms, so they’re strong. Horse riders know how to… Ride. But you wouldn’t want sprinters because their goal is to finish the quickest.

But then I was wondering what would make a shooter so good in bed.

Anyway, the way I read your comment gave me a good chuckle. “The Olympian Sexual Performance Tier List.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because of the implication.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So these Olympians are in danger?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Nope. From what I’ve read even olympic athletes consider anyone good enough for the olympics as ‘top tier’. And it only lasts a few weeks

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sprinter? I hard know ‘er.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 493K

    Comments