138 points

Why would he?

… Because he is now and has always been a racist.

permalink
report
reply
105 points

Who would have thought that the son of an emerald mine oligarch from Racism: The Country would be racist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I always thought that title would go to us (germany) or to the usa, but yeah, i guess it’s a thing we all have in common.

20 years ago i was sure we’d live in a post-scarcity federation-of-planets style paradise by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

And a moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Don’t denigrate morons - there are plenty of morons who aren’t racist assholes and they manage not to buy into the great replacement theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But this one’s a special kind: a narcissistic moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
135 points

The great replacement is real, though. Whites have been replacing the indigenous people for centuries.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Yeah, but that was destiny, we had to manifest it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Something something Jeebus

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jeebus Crabbs

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

This is not a new development. He was raised with this ideals, brought them straight form his home in apartheid.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Immigrants against immigration. The classic American story.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

White Americans, what? Nothing better to do.

Why don’t you kick yourself out? You’re an immigrant too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

easily the worst song on the album, despite the nice message

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s a pretty hot take, seeing as it’s the most successful single off the album in terms of sales and airplay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Whites are being replaced in America. Thing is, there’s no conspiracy, it’s simply history unfolding. (It’s always been like this, poorer nations leak into more affluent populations. Because why wouldn’t they?!)

What we should ask these people is simple, “OK. Whites are going to be a minority sometime in the next couple of decades. Why is that a problem?

So why aren’t these people confronted with that simple question? Why can’t journalists nail them to the fucking wall when it’s so easy?!

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*

Exactly this.

You can’t sit there and vacuum money out of a country via decades and centuries of the virtual theft of natural resources and labor, and then not expect the people living there to go to where their money went.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That’s exactly my thought whenever I hear a British person complain about Caribbean people or a French person about Algerians. What did you expect? This is a direct consequence of colonialism and it’s much less disruptive than you deserve, just calm the fuck down

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

"In future, everyone’s going to be beige. "

- Russell Peters

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 332K

    Comments