“Mr Giuliani’s bankruptcy creditors had previously filed a motion to compel him to sell his condo — the former mayor said he needs it to keep him off the streets and recording his podcast”

184 points
*

And…?

Maybe he will finally empathise with those dirty homeless people who should just get a job.

permalink
report
reply
82 points

I’m sure he’ll just pull himself up by his bootstraps and start again!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Quick, someone give him a crippling opioid addiction to speed up the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

If I’d believe for a second that he might actually end up homeless I’d say “and making anyone homeless for any reason is a bad thing”. But I don’t. And it’s not empathy for him anyway, I just care about the principle of not throwing people into the streets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Yeah and I mean, I agree with you, but he can get a shitty hole in the wall apartment, he doesn’t need a multi-million dollar condo to not be homeless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

And…?

That’s only supposed to happen to the plebs, not an elite like him!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I wouldn’t feel safe with him on the streets. Can we implement a “stop and frisk” law that targets ancient sex pests?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You think his hairs running now, you ain’t seen nothin yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Now do one with a Springtail

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Is that even smaller?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

ERMAGERD I fucking love it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

Yes, that’s how things work: if you can’t pay your bills, you can be forced to sell stuff. I’m sure there are any number of homeless people who also felt it was unfair to lose their homes. And a lot of them lost their homes through medical debt or simple bad luck, not from deliberately trying to overthrow our system of government.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I genuinely truly hope this is the really message that gets picked up and repeated. It is their exact fucking logic for why they show no empathy for the less fortunate -’ they must have done something to put themselves there.’ Cuz it really doesn’t fucking matter that it is Rudy, literally ANY other politician and entitled wealthy jackals would say. The problem is their toxic hypocrisy that costs people their lives.

Phew sorry. Bit of a rant there on your comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s a disconnect here: you assume that merit is based upon actions… and it is, for the egalitarian outlook.

An authoritarian outlook assumes merit based on status. As in, ‘if you have status it is due to your intrinsic worth’. Rich people deserve it… because they are rich. It makes my eyes cross and is gut-wrenchingly frustrating, but about 25% of humans lean this way it seems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Homeless Rudy? Well, its a good thing you’ve spent your entire life upholding and strengthening the social safety net for people that need help, like you do now, right? RIGHT?!

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*
permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 332K

    Comments