cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17617609

They supposedly can be disabled in settings- but we all know that won’t last. They’re going full Microsoft Skype mode and it’s only a matter of time.

102 points

Good. I hope people will move away from it soon. I hate Discord for banning third-party clients and datamining my system for installed apps. So I’ve never really used it.

It does mean I’m excluded from some FOSS projects’ support like Home Assistant but to hell with that :P

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Hopefully those FOSS projects will gain some sense as discord becomes more shit and will leave. One can hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I never understood how a chatroom took off as a tool to document stuff. Who seriously thinks this is a good idea? 😵

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If a project only has Discord for support (no docs, no bug tracker), I’m not using it. Don’t want to deal with trying to find anything in Discord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Most projects still haven’t left GitHub…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

ideally such changes to advertising and the ToS arbitration clause removing consumer rights will help give a lot of the open-source communities a gentle push to get off of discord. It’s become far too central to too many communities and is impossible to search for knowledge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hey I am here

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

never allowed 3rd party apps

Facebook used to allow third party apps (e.g. Snaptu started as a third-party app before the acquisition) and exposed most of the functionality via their API, but it’s not really a thing any more after Cambridge Analytica - the API was locked down significantly. You can’t really have it both ways… Allowing third-party apps also allows those apps to scrape and store user info, which is what Cambridge Analytica did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I’ve only ever used it in browser to limit what it can see on my machine. I was told by one of my coding professors that one of the signs of a virus is if it monitors what apps you’re running, I’ve been cautious ever since of anything that does that (obviously it isn’t the only sign and isn’t instant virus bin, like I have an app that monitors GPU usage and throttles apps to keep from cooking my machine)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t forget that it saves even your deleted DMs for as long as you have an account!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People will move away, sure, but to another proprietary service that’ll do the same thing in a year or two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

this will always happen unless we move to FOSS

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Hope we get some comparable options yet, I only know of matrix and that one allegedly has tons of security and performance issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Can you list some security/performance/feature comparison between matrix and discord? I don’t have the need for these class of product, but I am trying to get the hype behind discord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I don’t know about discord issues, the hype behind is it mostly that it’s free, very convenient, feature rich and can easily integrate bots. Its the go-to place to build communities nowadays.

Matrix issues that I read about can be seen here https://telegra.ph/why-not-matrix-08-07 . I haven’t done my own research tho so I don’t know if all of this is (still) true

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Mattermost does most of the required discord features. (Pun intended)

Is open source and is selfhost-able. I think there are some SaaS hosters if you need them too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, some of us tried to get our work to that but higher ups went with rocket chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s often not the cost of the software, but the hosting costs, especially on a growing platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

platforms can be peer to peer too, with maybe a cheaper to host tracker. i think its viable for a chat app, like matrix, for example.

overall yes though, i wonder when lemmy is gonna start having these issues, its still mostly run by unpaid volunteers…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think it’s why many decentralised platforms don’t want very big instances, and prefer them to split off into smaller federated sites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Most of these platforms make no money but have taken huge amounts of VC funding which they have burned through. For the VCs to unload it and cash out they need to show the product can be monetised and them try and shift it before the users leave the platform. Idiot users want all the features of a product developed by lots of talented full time paid staff but don’t want to pay for it themselves so they leap from startup to startup then complain when the inevitable happens while dismissing open source alternatives as inadequate for their needs. Why should we care? I don’t.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

While I don’t disagree with the sentiment, the Discord Nitro subscription has been around for a long while. From what I’ve seen using the platform it seems relatively popular. I’d guess adding ads to the free tier is as much about enticing people onto the subscription (which presumably won’t have ads).

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ubtil they go to the Netflix model where users can experience both a subscription and ads at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I doubt it. Video ads are worth a lot more. Unless they ad them to live streams Twitch style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And Nitro isn’t exactly inexpensive either, or wasn’t last time I used Discord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve been using Discord almost since launch, and in that time, not a single feature did I find as an important addition to the program. It is now much more bloated with unnecessary stuff, stuff for which they paid those talented devs you mention.

I would have been perfectly content with a one-time payment to use it and it would have worked perfectly well for them with that model if they didn’t get greedy and want to stuff it with random junk to justify a subscription.

I don’t mind paying as long as it’s not a subscription scam for no reason at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

IRC still rules. No ads in my irssi.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Does IRC do voice nowadays? I think that is the main reason people use Discord

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If you mean that in some channels only some people can actually “talk”, I think it depends on the configuration of the channel, but it’s a possibility.

I thought people used Discord because you could have video / audio chats (not sure about this, I’ve used it very sparsely.)

And then there are Open Source projects that use Discord as the documentation repository. Hell is a place on the Internet, apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Discord became popular because it’s a more convenient integration of audio chat for gaming, with text chat: no need to set up a server (like TeamSpeak or Mumble).

People using Discord for official documentation, or bug reporting, are in a circle of hell just slightly below the ones doing the same on Reddit. Community support… they may get a pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

they meant voice chat, audio

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, I mean audio chats (voice is short for voice chat). I think the video calls are not used as much, but are still a good feature. I’ll probably try Revolt (someone linked it below)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn’t even support encryption support voice?

It doesn’t support having messages received while you were offline

IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.

People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Mumble exists

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I find there is no shortage of delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Even here on Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I figured that was still the case, but would have been pleasantly surprised if it wasn’t. I don’t really keep up on IRC these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

slowly moving myself to https://revolt.chat/.

Its sad since I’ve been with discord since almost '15.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Compared to Matrix, or any E2EE chat, this doesn’t sound good:

we take your privacy very seriously. And with end-to-end encryption coming to DMs and group chats soon

Compared to Discord, or other established voice chat systems like Mumble, this doesn’t sound great either:

We are currently rebuilding the client and the voice server from scratch. The old voice should work in most cases, but it may inexplicably not connect in some scenarios and / or exhibit weird behaviour.

The “app” on Android seems to be just the webapp running in a standalone window.

I’ll concede them the OpenSource and self-hosted factors, and it does look like Discord, but it doesn’t seem like a suitable replacement for average users… yet. Then again, the ads might push them over.

Guess it’s worth to keep an eye on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Oh, this looks great. Honestly, I am very happy when closed-source apps become worse, these are all just opportunities for open source to move in and take over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

so this Revolt project is open source, which is nice, but still seems to rely on centralized servers. Does it use P2P for voice+video+fileshare so that the original devs aren’t on the hook for insane bandwidth requirements? I can’t see anything about their networking systems in the FAQ or info pages.

I may consider getting my friends to switch sooner or later if it’s more P2P based. But I don’t really want something that runs ALL traffic through central servers, because the bandwidth costs will inevitably just lead to the same situation that Discord is now in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s self-hostable, and they seem to be switching to webrtc-rs, not sure whether with P2P or not:

https://trello.com/c/Ay6KdiOV/1-voice-overhaul-and-video-calling

In 2022, they claimed it was using minimal resources on the server:

https://developers.revolt.chat/faq/monetisation

They also don’t seem to consider federation as a priority, but then again neither does Discord.

https://developers.revolt.chat/faq/federation

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What made you choose revolt chat over matrix? Just curious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Oh cool there’s an Android app, that’s gonna make it so much easier to recommend!

Edit: I just read about how it’s centralized and not encrypted, I’m not sure how this can become anything but Discord except open source and less popular. Matrix + Element seems to cover my use case for a project a bit better, I’ll give that a try.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just tried it… it says “Running in Chrome”. Seems to be a repackaged webapp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

well that’s no different than Discord already, so net zero change

running webapps in chrome or Electron containers simplifies a lot of development, i don’t like their resource requirements or dependency on Chromium, but I do understand needing to streamline development so devs can work on more important backend stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments