Loblaws recently installed 7 foot high Plexiglass barriers that funnel people out of the stores. They claim it will stop theft and make people safer.

Many people have voiced concerns about these barriers possibly being a fire hazard, in the sense that they might create a bad bottle neck in the event of an evacuation. Many people panic during an emergency. However, I have also seen many people stating that it’s not technically against the fire code.

In your opinion, is this a hazard? Do you think it’s fine, or do you think that this could be one of those situations that ends up causing new regulations to be added after casualties happen? Do you think that people are too worried, or do you think that these concerns are valid?

https://www.blogto.com/eat_drink/2024/04/ontario-barriers-exit-loblaws-store/

29 points

All I could think of, was the Bob Loblaw law blog.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

You, Sir, are a mouthful!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bob Loblaw’s Law Blog Lobs Law Bomb

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Make people feel safer… right.

Self check outs basically transferred the labour from an employee supplied by the grocer to the consumer, resulting in lower employment costs for the grocer and greater time and effort expenditure for the consumer.

The deliberate programming choices of the self check outs at loblaws are especially annoying :do you want to donate to charity on our behalf? Accidentally scan an item twice? Gotta wait for someone to come cancel it for you. It takes like 5 clicks to get to paying these fuckers.

Then they want to surveill everyone on the way out like they don’t trust you, after they transferred all the labour to you?

Ya fuck that, no wonder people get pissed. Like seriously fuck off. And on top of all that you get absolutely gouged.

Went from shopping there weekly to never stepping foot in that god awful store, spend your money elsewhere.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

If your only defence for a thing is “it’s not technically against the fire code”, then it’s a fire hazard. Like, if I say “I technically didn’t steal your watch”, then you would say “give me back my watch”.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

This reads like a phrase from Half as Interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I just assume everything loblaws does to be evil now.

Personally I don’t see any inherent problems with these small jumpable gates at first glance. But I’m sure there’s something sinister and evil about them and that I’m not seeing, because loblaws is literally Satan.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Loblaws recently installed 7 foot high Plexiglass barriers

You can jump 7’?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh. I went by the pictures and I didn’t see the glass added on top. I’m big dumb.

But I was right, loblaws is doing evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Being rather familiar with american fire codes, this would be followed here by a fire marshall showing up and asking if they wanted to take these down or have the building closed.

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.7K

    Posts

  • 310K

    Comments