Argentina formally requested on Thursday to join NATO as a global partner, a status that would clear the way for greater political and security cooperation at a time when the right-wing government of President Javier Milei aims to boost ties with Western powers and attract investment.

The request came as NATO’s Deputy General Secretary Mircea Geoana held talks in Brussels on regional security challenges with visiting Argentine Defense Minister Luis Petri.

Geoana said he welcomed Argentina’s bid to become an accredited partner in the alliance — a valued role short of “ally” for nations that are not in NATO’s geographical area and not required to take part in collective military actions. NATO membership is currently limited to countries of Europe, Turkey, Canada and the United States.

The designation could allow Argentina access to advanced technology, security systems and training not previously available to it, the Argentine presidency said.

47 points

That headline is misleading. They don’t want to join NATO. They want to be a NATO partner like a few other countries not in North America or Europe. They wouldn’t be part of the mutual defense pact but their military and arms dealers would use NATO “standards.”

It’s probably more about him wanting Argentina to manufacture some NATO-approved weapons — like get a subcontract to make spare parts and ammo for NATO tanks — and also modernize Argentina’s military by training with NATO countries

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Sweden and Finland joining NATO: We had good reasons not to join previously, but we’re now genuinely worried about Russia’s recent expansionism, and as its neighbours, and we want tighter military cooperation with our allies.

Milei joining NATO: Man wouldn’t I look cool in the photo.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s part if his well thought out strategy of “please let me part of the cool kids group I’ll do anything I’ll strip down the country and sell it for scraps just let me smell Ayn Rand’s clothes”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Worked great for Yelstin

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If they were to expand it beyond the region, you’d expect a few other countries to join before Argentina: Japan and South Korea, to name two.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Japan and South Korea are already global partners

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just a reminder that NATO used to stand for North Atlantic yada yada. Should I expect Japan to relocate to Atlantic Ocean anytime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not sure membership decisions should be primarily based on whether the acronym works well

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Turkey is already part of NATO and they aren’t on the Atlantic at all.
While they have coasts on several seas, they’re closer to the Indian ocean than they are the Atlantic Ocean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

NATO was always a military alliance built in opposition to Russia (back then the USSR), so Turkey had a lot of strategic value. The US has different sorts of relationships with countries that have no strategic interest in relation to Russia (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan), and NATO as a whole has nothing to gain from welcoming Argentina.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If you don’t think Japan has strategic interest in relation to Russia, you need to go brush up on your history and geography.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The US should take South America more seriously rather than the historical approach of trying to undermine them

Argentina is their best option for that currently

But it is interesting how many commentators jump into any NATO conversation to say it’s a bad idea

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

fascists can get fucked

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Aren’t they also trying to join bricks. Are they just signing up to everything as a last gasp to save the country?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

We are not, milei drop that when he became president

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am surprised, why did he drop it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Officialy? China bad, russian commies bad, US hell yeah, israel the superior race, eagles and freedom rules!!

Unofficially? Who knows. China and the US have been arm wrestling here for different topics. For example, we are buying f16 because USA gave a counteroffer so we dont buy chinese jets (now, staying close to nato could just be a way to ensure that we get f16 spare parts). The same happened (many times) when we were debating about buying a chinese PWR.

Now there is some fuzz about who controls the pass near tierra del fuego. China was building a restricted port and they already have a military base. US is now doing it too, but at least they promise to do it in colaboration with us… if this thing is real, it would be a miracle if we end the next decade still controlling Patagonia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 261K

    Comments