I know about software patents but what’s the point when somebody can achieve the exact same functionality from the user’s perspective using totally different code. Just seems like a waste on a patent lawyer.

41 points

It’s the functionality that’s patented. It’s not the code. Code is copyrighted.

permalink
report
reply

Can someone give an example of a time when software patents are good for everyone? Because I can only think of software patents that have prevented the widespread adoption of ideas, and not the opposite.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Isn’t that the point, though. Allow someone to profit from it rather than make it free to use. If there is another way to do it, that is not patented but free, they will use that, even if the code is objectively worse. See media codecs for example at the moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think the original intention was to motivate people to create new technologies. If you spent your life savings designing and prototyping a new product in your shed you don’t want a giant company being able to go “cool, thanks I’ll make them myself and run you out of business”.

The whole point is that you’ll invest into it because you’ll be able to profit off it afterwards

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It’s all marketing. You likely only know that Dominos had the system patented because it slaps a big patent number right on the tracker. The fact that you’re discussing it is essentially free advertising and increases brand awareness. So, this post suggests that the investment in patent lawyers was likely worthwhile for the company.

Largely, consumers seem to derive the below listed perceptions when they recognize that a product is protected by a patent:

  1. When a message about a product being protected by a patent is conveyed, the company as a whole is perceived to be innovative
  1. The patented product is perceived to be superior
  1. The patented product is perceived to be unique, as no one else can copy the patented product

from https://www.invntree.com/blogs/using-patents-marketing-tool-good-bad-and-ugly

(this is not a defense of any of these practices; simply indicating what is going on here)

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Fuck I fell for it… gg dominos

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Marketing is just mass manipulation and propaganda with a palatable name. :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This seems like a pretty standard solution for this kind of thing and I don’t believe it would have been patentable - there’s no breakthroughs here, even for 2007.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I had seen it noted on the tracker itself… but it also doesn’t seem very unique or useful overall.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It’s not useful, as it doesn’t always reflect reality so it’s just a bunch of loading bars to manage customer expectation. Ask the domino’s subreddit

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Oh it’s definitely useful.

The biggest benefit to all that tracking is they use all that data to optimise the delivery process which ultimately means shorter delivery times and lower prices. Those five dollar pizzas are partly thanks to cheap ingredients and low pay, but some of it is also efficient production and delivery.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programming

!programming@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments