Trump plans to assert an “advice of counsel” defense, claiming he was just following the legal advice of his attorneys. However, this defense comes with conditions that could undermine Trump’s case. By asserting this defense, Trump would waive attorney-client privilege, meaning communications with his attorneys would become available to prosecutors. His attorneys would also likely have to testify in court. Furthermore, prosecutors could argue that Trump’s attorneys were actually co-conspirators, not just legal advisors, and that Trump’s reliance on their advice was unreasonable. Special Counsel Jack Smith appears to have capitalized on this by naming Trump’s attorney co-conspirators in the indictment, which could allow him to crack open communications between Trump and his attorneys.

7 points

An “advice of counsel” defense would likely require Trump to testify on the stand and be open to cross examination.

An “advice of counsel” defense requires that the documented advice given align with actions taken. It seems that he was given advice to not do what he did, often.

permalink
report
reply

Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!

permalink
report
reply
71 points

yeah, it’s called a “trial”.

the “trap” is that he knows Trump will “lie” because Smith has “mountains of evidence” that Trump and his co-conspirators are “incredibly fucking guilty."

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Jack Smith lured Trump into committing crimes 3+ years ago, in what legal experts are calling “1D checkers.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Just repeat that with Mike Myers physically making the air quotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Thank you! It’s always interesting to listen to professionals in a field use technical language. 😃

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Huh i wasnt aware of the advice of counsel defense. Seems like the conditions are effective in blocking misuse of said defense. I do wonder if there has been a big case where this has been used succesfully, bc it doesnt really sound like a good strategy, even if we consider a less crazy context than this one.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

well… it’s not a good strategy if you’re lying your ass off, it happens to be true, AND you conspired with your lawyers to commit the crime you’re accused of.

now, Jack Smith (and every reasonable person on earth, the more clever dolphins, cetaceans, chimps, corvidae, octopods, and a couple of transdimentional mice) knows this is the case, so this is definitely a terrible strategy. It’s also patently Trump to blame anyone else for his own actions but himself. Predictable, even.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

a couple of transdimentional mice

Frankie and Benjy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Damn! Legal Jesus layin’ the smack down!

permalink
report
reply

Politics

!politics@beehaw.org

Create post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments