So… aren’t these wannabe twitter competitors going about the whole thing bass-ackwards?
I saw a broadly similar article the other day about some sort of shakeup in the Mastodon board of directors.
It’s as if they think the way do do an internet startup is to first appoint a board of directors and hire a raft of executives, then… um… you know… um… do some business… kinda… stuff…
I follow the Bluesky devs, I feel pretty confident that they are excited and taking their role in building a protocol and platform seriously.
I’ve yet to see a board of directors that wasn’t a joke anywhere though, so I guess I just assumed that this would happen everywhere.
bass-ackwards
is this how kids say ass-backwards now, or is this an attempt to avoid the (nonexistent) lemmy profanity filters lol
Seems like people were politely dancing around the fact that he was both an essentially absentee board member and a problematic one in openly criticising bsky and poisoning its well in terms of reputation. Seems that push finally came to shove and that he really needed to go and was happy to leave.
Mastodon gains a twitter board member and Bluesky sheds one. Interesting
Great
This is the best summary I could come up with:
On Saturday, Jack Dorsey posted on X about grants for open protocols from his philanthropic Start Small initiative.
Dorsey first announced Bluesky in 2019, back when he was still CEO of Twitter.
He wrote that Twitter (now X) was “funding a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media.”
Since then, Bluesky has become an independent public benefit corporation, led by CEO Jay Graber, with VC backing, and it opened to the general public in February.
Dorsey appears to have deleted his Bluesky account at some point last year, though his departure was only acknowledged at the time by a smattering of social media posts.
In addition to dropping corporate news, he’s also weighed in on the beef between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, unfollowed nearly every other account, and posted, “don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights.
The original article contains 268 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 43%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
“don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights”
Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can’t make this shit up.
This AI shithow butchered it. He actually said:
don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one)
He’s back to praising Musk. He is literally referring to Shitter as “freedom technology.” This guy can go die in a fucking ditch.
Pretty sure he left Bluesky because he was mad about them having a block feature. Basically when Musk turned a block into a mute, he turned tail from people actually trying to build a not-dogshit-product and ran back to his former dogshit product.
That’s arguably worse! He’s pissy that people aren’t allowed to freely harass others and calls that a right becuz muh freeze peach. What an enormous shit head.
Why are people still talking about the block feature? You can’t block people on decentralized platforms. Period.
Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can’t make this shit up.
As bad as it is for the public, it was brilliant business move. Pre-Musk Twitter was barely making any net income (post-Must it makes ZERO net income). It was a profitable business, but just barely, and had been unprofitable for many years.
Goading Musk into committing to buy Twitter at the inflated high stock price allowed Twitter shareholders to cash out at a far higher value than they ever could have trying to run Twitter as a money making venture.
Keep in mind, I’m not saying we don’t all lose because Twitter is a shithole now, but from a purely (cutthroat) business perspective the sale was a boon.
