-55 points

This is all false

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Later that afternoon, the company published the following statement:

We sincerely thank Jack for his help funding and initiating the bluesky project. Today, Bluesky is thriving as an open source social network running on atproto, the decentralized protocol we have built.

With Jack’s departure, we are searching for a new board member for the Bluesky public benefit company who shares our commitment to building a social network that puts people in control of their experience. More to come!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m not entertaining suitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s a troll account, disregard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s more for the people who don’t read the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points
*

So… aren’t these wannabe twitter competitors going about the whole thing bass-ackwards?

I saw a broadly similar article the other day about some sort of shakeup in the Mastodon board of directors.

It’s as if they think the way do do an internet startup is to first appoint a board of directors and hire a raft of executives, then… um… you know… um… do some business… kinda… stuff…

permalink
report
reply
13 points

bass-ackwards

is this how kids say ass-backwards now, or is this an attempt to avoid the (nonexistent) lemmy profanity filters lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

It’s the corporate boomer way of saying it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve been ironically saying it for years tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I had high school teachers in the 80s who said it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’ve heard it “bass-ackwards” way more than “ass-backwards”, for decades

It’s basically ass-backwards said ass-backwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ha, it’s been the family friendly variant for at least a few decades

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Pobody’s Nerfect

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

What do you mean? The board provides the guidance and plots the course for the “low potential” people to follow.

/sarcasm

Edit: I should clarify, my comment is not so much about Jack, but about people that run companies, but don’t do things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You um… did know that um… mastodon did produce a um… product before the board change, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I follow the Bluesky devs, I feel pretty confident that they are excited and taking their role in building a protocol and platform seriously.

I’ve yet to see a board of directors that wasn’t a joke anywhere though, so I guess I just assumed that this would happen everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Board positions exist as a way to funnel wealth to the children, relatives and friends of the people startups are going to for their initial investment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They may not know step 3, but they know that step 4 is PROFIT!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Great

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Mastodon gains a twitter board member and Bluesky sheds one. Interesting

permalink
report
reply
10 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Saturday, Jack Dorsey posted on X about grants for open protocols from his philanthropic Start Small initiative.

Dorsey first announced Bluesky in 2019, back when he was still CEO of Twitter.

He wrote that Twitter (now X) was “funding a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media.”

Since then, Bluesky has become an independent public benefit corporation, led by CEO Jay Graber, with VC backing, and it opened to the general public in February.

Dorsey appears to have deleted his Bluesky account at some point last year, though his departure was only acknowledged at the time by a smattering of social media posts.

In addition to dropping corporate news, he’s also weighed in on the beef between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, unfollowed nearly every other account, and posted, “don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights.


The original article contains 268 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 43%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
37 points

“don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights”

Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can’t make this shit up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

This AI shithow butchered it. He actually said:

don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one)

He’s back to praising Musk. He is literally referring to Shitter as “freedom technology.” This guy can go die in a fucking ditch.

Pretty sure he left Bluesky because he was mad about them having a block feature. Basically when Musk turned a block into a mute, he turned tail from people actually trying to build a not-dogshit-product and ran back to his former dogshit product.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“Go die for using the social media platform I don’t like” doesn’t seem unreasonable at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Why are people still talking about the block feature? You can’t block people on decentralized platforms. Period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That’s arguably worse! He’s pissy that people aren’t allowed to freely harass others and calls that a right becuz muh freeze peach. What an enormous shit head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Honestly, with the unfathomable amount of money he was set the make from that deal, I dont blame him for doing it.

It’s a good message too, if you ignore who said it and why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can’t make this shit up.

As bad as it is for the public, it was brilliant business move. Pre-Musk Twitter was barely making any net income (post-Must it makes ZERO net income). It was a profitable business, but just barely, and had been unprofitable for many years.

Goading Musk into committing to buy Twitter at the inflated high stock price allowed Twitter shareholders to cash out at a far higher value than they ever could have trying to run Twitter as a money making venture.

Keep in mind, I’m not saying we don’t all lose because Twitter is a shithole now, but from a purely (cutthroat) business perspective the sale was a boon.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments