122 points

That explains a lot.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Honestly, I think this might be on to something. RFK jr was not always a lunatic - before he went insane he did some truly great things in his career. He then gradually made a turn for the worse, ending up as the mentally insane candidate we know today. It honestly explains his political platform pretty well.

It also reminds me of that great infowars interview with a Sanders supporter (correctly?) observing that they have worms in their brains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My mother has taken a similar track, and come to find out about a quarter of her brain has died, presumably as a result of her cancer treatment. Today she’s a mind boggingly gullible person who’s fallen down every conspiracy theory hole that she’s come across.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly, I think this might be on to something.

The article says 2012, I don’t know much about parasites and how long they live, first, and second, if somebody had somewhat conspiracy-related views, but not too extreme, then got a parasite in their brain and things got bad, then those views would be retroactively interpreted as him having went mad earlier. So - if the worm lived for like 7 years, this makes sense, even if it didn’t, still possible.

Anyway, most of his activity of the anti-vaccine kind seems indeed to have started around 2012 or after that.

Which is a shame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I would add his previous habit of eating a lot of tuna. Mercury poisoning was likely why “mad as a hatter” came to be. Hatters would brighten their pins and needles with dips in quicksilver, to see them better. Holding some pins in the mouth caused ingestion in small amounts that slowly poison. It isn’t a far reach for a person to see their neurologic symptoms of mercury poisoning to be from another mercury source, like the mercury in one particular vaccine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

No wonder it died

It didn’t have enough food

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Makes me think of that scene from Futurama where Fry’s brain slug dies due to lack of food, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I can’t remember, was that just a “Fry dumb” thing, or was it related to his incestuous bootstrap lack of delta brainwave?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I don’t think they ever said one way or the other. I just remember H̶e̶r̶m̶e̶s̶ Farnsworth says something like, “The poor little guy starved to death.”

Edit: made a correction

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Fry dumb. You can pretend it’s more complicated if you want, but the joke is “Fry dumb”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

He said in a deposition that clinicians believed the parasite “got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died.”

Well, that’s reassuring. I’ll be sure to vote for the guy who had his brain eaten by a worm. That’s the best qualification you can get.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Is it possible the worm starved to death?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Poor little guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

The jokes write themselves

permalink
report
reply
69 points
*

When this hit Morning Joe on my morning drive into work, I had tears in my eyes from laughing so much.

What. The. Fuck.

it ate a portion of his brain

Seriously. What the fuck is this time-line?

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Aww. Poor worm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

The quote is hilarious

Kennedy said in the deposition that the doctor thought the spot on the scan “was caused by a worm that got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died.”

Just the way he said it makes it sound like eating his brain killed the worm…

Also, this was from a divorce testimony in 2012 about a past event.

It’s not a new development, he’s been like this over a decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The worm’s last words, “the moon landing causes autism”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Which one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Won’t someone think of the worms?!?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments