204 points

Why doesn’t she just take her Harry potter money and remove herself from society on some private island or something? How damaged do you need to be to want to start fights with an already marginalised section of society? What a rubbish human being!

permalink
report
reply
97 points

This is something I’ll never understand. If I won the lottery tomorrow I’d disappear in a puff of smoke. You wouldn’t catch me dead making a Tweet about it, much less fighting people over random bullshit

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

It all comes back to “Drama Kids” from school. And I don’t mean people who love to spread drama, but I mean theater kids. They LOOOOVE the spotlight, hence why they went into theater. They crave the attention, and they’re willing to put themselves out there for it regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Oh yeah, those theater kids and their notorious disdain of LGBT and other marginalized groups.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Because when you have everything the money can buy, you become greedy for attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Reminds me of Notch’s late tirades after selling mohjang, dude was clearly bored so picked fights on twitter every week. I’m glad he’s finding purpose again after deleting his account on a dare with another big game design youtuber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When you have all the money and power of a god all that’s left is being worshipped like one. These people are very mentally sick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Because once you have a taste of power you want more. She wants to use her position of influence to propagate her beliefs.

I’d be happy to retire to a small cottage on a private lake, but maybe I just haven’t been sufficiently corrupted by power yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Becuase then she’d be irrelevant in her own eyes and that’s not acceptable to her

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Honestly this is what I don’t understand about her, especially when her words and attitude go directly against the themes that the books she wrote outlined. For example, Hermione being called slurs like mudblood and the other characters sticking up for her. Hagrid who has to live with himself as part giant and is considered a threat by most of the wizarding world, but those who are close and know him, know that hes a kind hearted person.

In almost every instance where a character has to deal with something about themselves that’s different than the others, the lesson is that everyone should always accept who they are and that they’re valid in being who or what they are.

Instead in real life she just ignores all of this and just acts like a disgusting piece of shit, and you have to wonder how she even wrote these books when she lives her days talking and acting like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I find it hillarious that the only Harry Potter actor who defends JK’s bullshit is the guy who played Voldemort…

I understand actors are not the characters they play, but in a cosmic sense, that’s too damn funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not true, there’s also Helena Bonham Carter and the now deceased Robbie Coltrane

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because terfs think assigned sex is the thing to be accepted and not transness. Part of me sorta sees it when I look from a lens that completely ignores my experiences as a trans person and the experiences of every trans person I’ve spoken to. Misogyny is fucking rough, I get thinking people would do anything to avoid dealing with it. Dysphoria would’ve driven me to suicide though so I suck up the misogyny while I fight against it

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That’s the thing though - individuals learn to accept individuals as who they are. JKR establishes that there is systemic oppression in the wizarding world (house elf slavery is the big one, but it’s very explicit in the text that there are issues with goblins, centaurs and other magical races) - but does nothing to show that the systems have resolved/improved by the end of the series. Individuals learn lessons, but the system is inflexible.

The way that oppression is solved in the books is always through individual action. Even when the wizarding government is implementing policies harmful to muggle-norms/magical races, it’s portrayed as a bad person being bad because they are bad. Draco/Umbridge/Voldemort are individuals that we identify with the oppression itself, so the problem of dealing with wizard racism becomes the much simpler problem of dealing with The Bad Wizards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She has a Necrophilia Kink, and she explores it by murdering her own legacy and making out with the corpse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sounds about right

permalink
report
parent
reply
151 points
*

Here’s a Neil Gaiman thing to balance things out

permalink
report
reply
60 points

I was going to say that’s actually a G K Chesterton quote, but it turns out it’s more complicated than that. Neil Gaiman himself said it was from Chesterton (when quoting it at the start of Coraline), but he wrote it from memory and didn’t double check, so the original is worded differently. At least, that’s how my quick googling claims the paraphrase happened. The misquote is pithier than the original so… is it now a Gaiman quote, even though it originates as an attempted Chesterton quote?

As far as I can tell, the passage he was thinking of was:

Fairy tales do not give the child his first idea of bogey. What fairy tales give the child is his first clear idea of the possible defeat of bogey. The baby has known the dragon intimately ever since he had an imagination. What the fairy tale provides for him is a St. George to kill the dragon.

  • G K Chesterton, Tremendous Trifles (1909)
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Interestingly, on Gaiman and attribution, he came out with a graphic novel, The Books of Magic, with a main character very similar to Harry Potter. This was 7 years prior to Rowlings publishing the first book. His response to that similarity was equally charitable, chalking it to creators tapping into the same unconscious material. Dude seems to have integrity. I could see another person grousing at the parallels between the two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Neil Gaiman was close friends with the legendary Terry Pratchett. There’s no doubt he’s a better human being than Joanne.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Interestingly, on Gaiman and attribution, he came out with a graphic novel, The Books of Magic, with a main character very similar to Harry Potter. This was 7 years prior to Rowlings publishing the first book. His response to that similarity was equally charitable, chalking it to creators tapping into the same unconscious material.

Before either you had Luke Kirby in 2000AD. While it’s debatable whether Rowling would have been reading Vertigo comic books, Gaiman wrote for 2000AD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Interesting. When I was around 4 years old I suffered from debilitating nightmares to the point of refusing to go to sleep. Coincidentally, this was also when I came into contact with my first games (Amiga 500 at the time, I’m ancient) and somehow that “taught” my mind that you can fight back against the baddies and win. Never suffered from nightmares ever after that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

This quote always goes hand in hand with that one for me.

Since it is so likely that (children) will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker.

C.S. Lewis

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

JK Rowling can be beaten.

And defeated as well if you want to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

She can write pulp

but she can also be pulp

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

How can I use Lemmy in such a way that I see more Neil Gaiman than JK Rowling? Any tips?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
3 points

First link didn’t work for me but second link did. Spelling mistake or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At first I thought a simple find replace would work but then G man would be spouting all sorts of trash. We’d have to inject actual stories from a webscrape. or just ban the word Jk Rowling in the settings idk

permalink
report
parent
reply
147 points

permalink
report
reply
16 points

lolmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

I hate how this woman still gets attention. Sigh.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Ragebait and the internet, together forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Including here on Lemmy.

It’s why we’re here in this case specifically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points
*

My ghetto-rasied white sister-in-law that loves Motown & has worn cornrows, would quite literally beat her into a pulp for saying something this stupid within her reach.

And yes mouthy bigots deserve their ass beat, but go ahead & show the rest of us how you are so “progressive” that you stand up for the absolute worse of humanity.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Seems like a perfectly rational response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Eye for an eye

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I was being sarcastic; its fucking mental to brag about how easily your sister resorts to violence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Maybe she needs therapy (and no I’m not defending Rowling, she is trash)

Edit: downvoting therapy, upvoting violence. You people would make your parents proud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I hate to be honest but JKR’s words turn into literal violence for trans people soooo congrats on how high your horse is

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

congrats on how high your horse is

Quite ironic way to end a “I’m more woke than thou” comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

You’re saying wizard nerds who are fans of JKR… became violent toward trans people? Wat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Maybe, but I doubt it would really do anything for her. She’s actually not a bad person, but her upbringing means she’s not the least bit concerned about going to jail after whipping a bad person’s ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah I am not saying anger issues make someone “bad” I’m just suggesting they can be dealt with better ways than brutalizing another humam

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You dont respect my existence, you can expect my resistance.

See also: Talk shit, get hit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sorry bub, Lemmy isn’t really a place for centrism. Oppressors must be crushed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sadly it became a replacement for Reddit in many ways I hoped it wouldn’t be… The “Political Echo Chambers” and “Reddit Atheism” followed us

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

“I only like talking to people who are just like me and have the same views as me”.

Yeah that’s definitely not a way to fall into an echo chamber :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Seriously why do people describe themselves as awful people then think it’ll convince me they’re rational people with an opinion worth listening to?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 979

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments

Community moderators