"They need us. We don’t need them”

72 points

These folks, by design, are annoying all of the time, but lately, things seem to be getting worse. After being captured on tape spouting an anti-semitic conspiracy theory, Kennedy doubled down with an incoherent gripe about not getting Secret Service protection, which mainly appeared to be an excuse to dog whistle “14” and “88,” which are understood as coded signals of support to neo-Nazis.

Im just… Yikes.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

The fact he’s polling anywhere above 0% is fucking terrifying

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Most of his “Democratic” supporters are probably Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s really the Republicans that are bank rolling him as a spoiler candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think that’s just his last name doing the heavy lifting. Once you hear what he actually stands for (like being both antisemetic and supporting Israel no matter what they do), there’s probably not a huge constituency.

That’s probably why the media is amplifying him and not Marianne Williamson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Isnt he a prolific anti-vaxer as well? But then held a fund raiser that required attendees to be vaxxed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Now I must go look these dog whistles up so I can know the enemies of America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Perhaps, Musk can create some bots that auto respond in a shocker manner to the trolls so they keep paying for the blue checks. Sort of like what those dating sites did with the fake members.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

First off, it’s funny that you think Musk can create software that works, and secondly, what bots on what dating sites??

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

💩

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

He destroyed Twitter and made a shitty alt right page

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It seemed intentional

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s giving him way too much credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Interesting take. I wonder how it will pan out.

All this, Ryan said, explains why the trolls “are getting more extreme and desperate.” The pool of people available to get attention from is shrinking, so the only way to keep the engagement rates as high is to say wilder and nastier things

If that happens then it will just implode quite rapidly. Regular users will just leave and that fuels the fire and Twitter just becomes yet another niche right wing echo chamber in no time.

I do question the claim that ‘the trolls are getting more extreme’ though. That seems like anecdotal evidence and I wonder if it’s actually happening. The author listed many examples of extreme views on Twitter but I could have done the same thing and made the same claim 5 years ago. There has always been loonies on there and some of them get worse and some don’t.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Naww poor widdle baby’s can’t scam people as easy now. Does the baby need their binky?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments