21 points

In addition to making it easier to find authentic perspectives, we’re also improving how we rank results in Search overall, with a greater focus on content with unique expertise and experience. Last year, we launched the helpful content system to show more content made for people, and less content made to attract clicks. In the coming months, we’ll roll out an update to this system that more deeply understands content created from a personal or expert point of view, allowing us to rank more of this useful information on Search.

That seems like just a step in the inevitable AI arms race.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Yeah but if this is what it takes to get a recipe search result that isnt 50 ads and a 5 page essay before the actual content, I ain’t going to complain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is why I use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, and Firefox with a few selected extensions that ensure I almost never see an ad. I would be shocked if Google enabled any long-term ad-free experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As crappy as googles results seem to have gotten over the last year, anytime I try to set my browser default search to anything else, I end up irritated and going back to Google for 50% of my searches(maybe even more ). Bing is fairly decent, but if the goal is privacy…

The alternative search engines just always lack the context–ehich presumably google has from me by pilfering my information for the last 2 decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

They’re talking about the ads on the site, not on Google.

Basically saying if this helps them find sites that focus on content and not extracting profit, they won’t have an issue with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Shit ChatGPT is a better recipe writer than 99% of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They gonna include my perspective that Google has helped foment discord in society and has helped strip away any type of privacy we had online while attempting to turn us into mindless addicted drones that just click and buy so they can make another cent?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Narrator: they won’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I give it 2 years

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Google has a bad reputation for killing its own products, to be sure. This is a part of Search, though, so I think less likely to die. If the results are terrible, and users don’t click on them, I bet you are right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hear that digital storefronts are catering to search engines more than people. I can imagine people wanting to ootimize their answers the same way for all kinds of reasons. Unless google is very careful (lol) bots will end up spewing malicious answers across the first page of google search.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Also many “prospectives” are just going to be from “influencers” who got the product for free or have some kind of sponsorship with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve read several people complain over the last year or so that Google’s results have been getting worse and they add site:reddit.com or similar to improve the results. I use a search engine called Kagi that includes a “lens” to see forum results only which is neat. I wonder if this is Google’s attempted answer.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments