37 points
*

Land doesn’t vote.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It has been enacted into law by 17 states and DC with 209 electoral votes. It needs an additional 61 electoral votes to go into effect.

https://www.nationalpopularvote.com

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yeah but the people who own land matter more. The 17 that passed this are probably not the 100% red states here so this is gonna go nowhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It won’t matter if those who enacted total more than 50% of the electoral votes.

As of April 15, 2024, the National Popular Vote bill has been enacted into law in 18 jurisdictions possessing 209 electoral votes, including

6 small jurisdictions (District of Columbia, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Rhode Island, Vermont), 9 medium-sized states (Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington), and 3 big states (California, Illinois, New York)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

After the last 25 years of American presidential elections, I’m more convinced than ever that I cannot trust a minority or a majority of them to make the right choices.

Tangentially and rhetorically, I wish Trump were president right now so that non-right-wing Americans could be convinced that genocide’s not a good look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wonder which states would be the most reasonable choices to get the extra 61

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The parties switched up during the Civil Rights Movement. Why does the map include both before and after that time?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The Civil Rights movement is what caused Republicans to move towards business and away from helpful social policies. The Democrats saw the shift as lots of their own rank fled to join the Goldwater Rs and pivoted to grab the underrepresented folks. This broadly created the current business focused Republican Party and the social focused Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The business part is not true. Hoover was a Republican President who loved big businesses. FDR was a Democratic President who enacted many policies to help poor people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The republican party has been pro big business since the late 1800s. As the other person has mentioned, you can see the parties’ modern economic stances by the 1930s. The Civil Rights movement just shifted them to the Business and Racism party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, from what I can tell, pre-Nixon Republicans were basically libertarians, and pre-Nixon Democrats were basically whatever the opposite of that is, although they were both moderate to near-indistinguishability at times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think you are thinking of the whigg party and the democrats. That was long before the Civil Rights Movement. The big shift during the time was black voters switching to democrats because of republican speeches against the Civil Rights Act. https://www.studentsofhistory.com/ideologies-flip-Democratic-Republican-parties

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Switched as in the spiderman meme. America doesn’t have a left and right party, you have two rightwing ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I feel like when comparing over a such a vast time scale party affiliation becomes less useful as a metric.

Society and mores have changed so much over the last 80+ years that it’s better to ask about specific questions or habits like: Do you support a smoking ban in public spaces? or Schools should provide free meals to students: yes/no and see how the answers develop over time.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Similarly erratically, Nate Silver of 538 fame was pretty sure American Democrats would be more hesitant to wearing masks during a pandemic than Republicans would be because Democrats were known for more of a my-body-my-choice philosophy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I read his personal blog a bit recently, and I was surprised by how much he talks about the “woke left”. If I ever met him, I’d want his take on all the statistics that, to me, make that group out to be mostly a straw man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Keep in mind not all states were states at the conclusion of the war. Only Alaska and Hawai’i, but still, they lost a few years.

permalink
report
reply

Map Enthusiasts

!map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz

Create post

For the map enthused!

Rules:

  • post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps

  • be nice

Community stats

  • 819

    Monthly active users

  • 345

    Posts

  • 4K

    Comments