159 points

That headline, though. He made fake 911 calls. Or he made false reports in 911 calls.

If you report fake 911 calls, you’re helping police to catch the swatter.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Thank youuuuu

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Probably AI generated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wait, I don’t understand the difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Either he called 911 reporting events that did not happen or he reported others’ 911 calls as false.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

If you call yourself a cyber-terrorist you should be ransomwaring banks, not swatting normal people

“The caller laughed and taunted officers, stating that he was hiding under multiple VPNs (virtual private networks),”

permalink
report
reply
56 points

The article states the cop who heard the taunt traveled a long distance to be there at sentencing.

“Remember me?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

As long as it wasn’t on tax paper dime for travel expenses I’m ok with that level of petty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Sweet summer child…

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

“Like pouring salt in the wound, you left a voicemail for our chief of police directing him to an online post where you gloated about the event. You wasted countless hours when our patrol officers could have responded to emergencies. I traveled 2400 miles to tell you this in person. I told you that you would be held accountable,” Grispino said during the hearing.

Power move

permalink
report
reply
23 points

That’d make a good movie scene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

Listening to the audio, he knew exactly what he was doing and took absolute glee in being a “cyber terrorist”. This wasn’t some random mischief, he was a serious prick who deserves the prison time.

*Should be supervision for the rest of his life. Psychopath like this, there’s a good chance he will try swatting or hacking whoever prosecuted him.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

“To know that I caused so much pain and irreversible damage to someone for no reason other than petty reasons. It’s disheartening to me, to my family,” Garcia said in court. Garcia said he had an online persona that disconnected him from reality.

He’s really sorry though, he had no idea UwU

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

With a face like that, he’ll be getting a serious prick during prison time, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Swatting should be treated as attempted murder. If a person dies in the altercation, then premeditated murder.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Swatting should be considered a failure of law enforcement.

If a police department gets tricked into Swatting an innocent party due to a fraudulent call to 911, the entire department should be disbanded and replaced with officers who do due diligence before busting people’s doors down. If anyone dies, the officer who signed off on the raid gets charged with murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If a police department gets tricked into Swatting an innocent party due to a fraudulent call to 911, the entire department should be disbanded and replaced with officers who do due diligence before busting people’s doors down.

But what if it’s actually serious?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yep. If the department ignores a call, believing it’s a hoax, & it turns out not be?

Someone’s gonna shit the bed if that goes down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I believe US law punishes the person committing a crime if the police kills someone intervening to said crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But never the cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 389K

    Comments