I’m not trying to start a war here, just wondering what your takes are. They pretty much have the same concept of lightweight desktop, but with different toolkits.

I’m a KDE person myself, but I’ve had experience with XFCE.

I’ve tried LXQt in the past but never really gotten into it, perhaps the timing was just not right.

8 points

I feel the same, though having more options for lightweight DEs is better. I came from gnome 2 after Ubuntu switched to Unity DE back in the day. Xubuntu ran nice on all of my kids low power devices and it became my desktop as well ever since. It’s just as happy on my work laptop as well as Ryzen thread ripper with 3 rtx4000s and 3 magewell hdmi capture cards we use for visualization at work too. It really feels like a solid DE with less fuss than most.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

I liked Xfce a lot, and used it for more than a few years, until it migrated to Gtk 3. (Modern Gtk breaks things that I use, and forces UI decisions that constantly get in my way. It’s just not for me.) It has also become more memory-hungry over the years, so is no longer quite the lightweight desktop that it once was, although that’s not why I switched.

LXQt was first on my list when looking for a replacement, but I used it only briefly, because there were too many rough edges and little integration problems. It didn’t feel like a cohesive desktop compared to (old) Xfce. I imagine some of that was a side effect of ongoing work to transition away from Gtk. It was a couple years ago, so it might be better now. I still love the idea of it.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

XFCE would be my go-to if I used a DE. I tried LXQT briefly in a VM but I found it a little unpolished.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

A little unpolished even now? I had the same impression but that was a few years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well perhaps I should have specified, but I tried it a couple years ago at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve lived in XFCe for years, awhile ago, now use LXQT.

XFCe had this goddamn thing where windows had a 1-pixel thick window-grabber.

There was no means of fixing it, that I could find.

UbuntuStudio.org used XFCe, too, btw…

Eventually I got sooo fed-up with the broken UX that I just committed to never using XFCe ever again.

That was sometime in the last few years…

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Heh that is annoying, then I learned about alt-rmb. They really do need a way to allow for larger grab areas easily, if not already possible.

I found this solution to border theme for increased grab area and will try it as well:

https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=54045#p54045

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In my experience, lxqt is lighter, but xfxe has more features and is more friendly to people with low tech skills, so I usually recommend xfce.

permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you’re a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we’re excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let’s dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 481

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments

Community moderators