I’m not trying to start a war here, just wondering what your takes are. They pretty much have the same concept of lightweight desktop, but with different toolkits.
I’m a KDE person myself, but I’ve had experience with XFCE.
I’ve tried LXQt in the past but never really gotten into it, perhaps the timing was just not right.
I also went from xfce to lxqt.
In my experience, lxqt is lighter, but xfxe has more features and is more friendly to people with low tech skills, so I usually recommend xfce.
I’ve lived in XFCe for years, awhile ago, now use LXQT.
XFCe had this goddamn thing where windows had a 1-pixel thick window-grabber.
There was no means of fixing it, that I could find.
UbuntuStudio.org used XFCe, too, btw…
Eventually I got sooo fed-up with the broken UX that I just committed to never using XFCe ever again.
That was sometime in the last few years…
Heh that is annoying, then I learned about alt-rmb. They really do need a way to allow for larger grab areas easily, if not already possible.
I found this solution to border theme for increased grab area and will try it as well:
XFCE would be my go-to if I used a DE. I tried LXQT briefly in a VM but I found it a little unpolished.
A little unpolished even now? I had the same impression but that was a few years ago.
I liked Xfce a lot, and used it for more than a few years, until it migrated to Gtk 3. (Modern Gtk breaks things that I use, and forces UI decisions that constantly get in my way. It’s just not for me.) It has also become more memory-hungry over the years, so is no longer quite the lightweight desktop that it once was, although that’s not why I switched.
LXQt was first on my list when looking for a replacement, but I used it only briefly, because there were too many rough edges and little integration problems. It didn’t feel like a cohesive desktop compared to (old) Xfce. I imagine some of that was a side effect of ongoing work to transition away from Gtk. It was a couple years ago, so it might be better now. I still love the idea of it.