An Oregon man who drugged his daughter and her friends with fruit smoothies laced with a sleeping medication after they didn’t go to bed during a sleepover was sentenced to two years in prison.

Michael Meyden, a 57-year-old from the Portland suburb of Lake Oswego, apologized during his sentencing Monday after pleading guilty to three felony counts of causing another person to ingest a controlled substance, The Oregonian reported.

“My whole life is destroyed,” he told the court. “Everything that was important to me up until that point is gone.”

24 points

Two years is not enough for attempted rape.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

There’s no evidence of attempted rape right?

The 2 years was specifically for drugging kids so they would go to sleep because there was no evidence of anything like sexual assault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

An article was linked in other comment threads, there was a clear start and an uncomfortable girl who texted her mom with absolute fear of being raped.

Something a lot more than moving them around may have happened if she didn’t send that text. So yes, no clear attempt at sexually assaulting the girls, but the amount of effort he went to… Doesn’t give me the feeling that this was only about a good night’s rest.

That said, I’d prefer the girls safe over him getting more time in prison any day of the week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

100% the guy is an irresponsible creep with terrible judgment and should never be allowed around a kid again.

But as far as any evidence and testimony provides, that’s as far as it goes and we do not need inaccurate, alarmist commentary to emphasize how wrong what he actually did was.

If someone punches somebody else, and then a third party screams about how that bastard murderer killed a guy, then it turns out he didn’t kill anyone, it ultimately discredits the actual story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Wait… did we read the same article?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

I feel like dude can come back from this if he only did it cause he was fed up with their shit and wanted them to go to sleep. That’s just a really dumb mistake. The headline immediately makes you think rapey stuff might have gone on (or been the motive).

permalink
report
reply
38 points

No. Do not fucking downplay drugging children. You should delete your comment, it’s entirely unacceptable to drug your own children without their knowledge, let alone other children sleeping at your house. It’s not just a dumb mistake, holy shit do you have a bad take here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

It’s not just a bad take but a) dangerous and b) criminal. For any kids sake I hope that the commentor you replied to has no access to children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

… because rapey stuff seemed to start happening and may have continued if one of the girls didn’t text someone?

dude was checking them for consciousness, something unnecessary if he only wanted them to sleep.

if he was checking them to ensure they were alive, then he deserves a serious ass prison sentence as well, because he then clearly understood how risky what he was doing was.

so … yeah, as far as I am concerned this guy seems like prison is the right answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Could go either way as he dosed preteen children with fucking benzos.

I figured it was something like melatonin and the punishment might have been excessive, but nope.

Intentions aside, that’s just really unsafe.

Although now I’m curious if was at least measuring out the dose for each drink, or just tossing some undissolved pills in the blender and hoping it distributes evenly.

Edit: Holy shit does that AP article leave out some details. This guy was definitely looking to abuse the kids

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeah, sure looks like it:

Investigators saw the text the girl sent a family friend. The girl’s message said Meyden “kept moving us away from each other but kept doing tests to make sure we weren’t awake,” according to the affidavit. She texted that one of the girls “won’t wake up,” the filing states.

The court record says the girl saw Meyden return to the basement a third time and he “seemed drunk.”

The only reason we know about it is because one of the girls didn’t drink the drug laced smoothies. The others that did were “groggy or blacked out” through the next day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It sounds like that was their argument at trial. But if you read the article, it tells you he did more than just drug them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

There is no good motive here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Why benzos? I feel like he would have not raised suspicion or gotten in the same trouble if he’d just let the girls eat some melatonin gummies or something. Wouldn’t even need to be sketchy about it.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

He didn’t have any rufies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

So “drug them”, just not as hard?

C’mon man, these are kids. They’re not even all his kids. It’s a sleepover. They stay up late or even to the wee hours of the morning and make noise, watch movies, whatever. That’s what you do as a kid on a sleepover. Giving them any substance to try to make them sleep is a ridiculous idea on multiple levels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Melatonin gummies? Those count as “drugs”? I thought they were considered supplements like vitamins and stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can’t give people unexpected things in their food. I think in your hypothetical case intent is the issue. The intent is to give a substance to a person in order to have an effect on that person who is unaware of it, and if that person can claim harm, you’re in deep shit.

It’s no different than putting a natural laxative or 6 million scoville hot sauce in your lunch trying to trap an office lunch thief. None of them are drugs, and in that (hypothetical) situation one would think the bastard deserves it, but legally you’d lose if they reported harm from it because you knew it was possibly going to be stolen and the intent was to have negative effect on the thief. The only grey area would be if you said you like the food spicy, but two edged sword - the judge could make you eat it to prove it.

Anyway, off on a tangent, there. Point is if you adulterate food with the intent to have an effect on someone unaware of the change to the food chances are you’re toast if they say it harmed them. In the article the guy did it to kids, kids that weren’t his, and that’s fucked up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If it was just about sleep he wouldn’t be facing any serious time. This was attempted rape.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Could you point out where it says that? I’m not trying to defend this guy in any way shape or form, but I’m not into hysteria and making things up, either. Even the most sensational report only offered the opinion that you don’t touch kids unless you have bad intent. And that’s an opinion, not a statement of the perp’s actual intent. Dude f’d up bad, but it doesn’t mean he’s instantly a molester.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Read the entire events. I don’t believe it was about sleep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
16 points

Fuck those comments man… I have a daughter and she is fond of sleepovers… if I ever get a text from her asking for help, I would show up in that house like the Kool-aid man from hell

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Of course it was Lake Oswego.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

What’s that mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Lake O is the rich Portland suburb, and this is such a stupid rich white man crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That and West Linn next door

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
12 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh no, worse? How bad are we talking?

Are they gonna form a punk rock band too?

Maybe they’ll be gasp dancing?

I sure hope they don’t try to go to college!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

No? No elaboration? Afraid to say the quiet parts? Ok I’ll say them for you.

This line of thinking is disgusting. You’re saying that because these girls will* partake in drugs and other “uncouth” behavior in the future, them getting it now isn’t a big deal.

Just in case anyone couldn’t read between the lines. If we’re going to be gross, let’s just cut the pretenses and just say it, eh?

*Nevermind that you know nothing about these kids now, let alone their futures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Care to elaborate on exactly what you mean with the last bit, about them smoking pot by 14. I’m curious.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 393K

    Comments