48 points

Interacting with people whose tone doesn’t match their words may induce anxiety as well.

Have they actually proven this is a good idea, or is this a “so preoccupied with whether or not they could” scenario?

permalink
report
reply
43 points
*

Have they actually proven this is a good idea, or is this a “so preoccupied with whether or not they could” scenario?

It’s businesses “throwing AI into stuff”, so I’m going to say it’s a safe bet it’s the latter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s probably the Jurassic Park effect

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The biggest problem I see with this is the scenario where calls are recorded. They’re recorded in case we hit a “he said, she said” scenario. If some issue were to be escalated as far as a courtroom, the value of the recording to the business is greatly diminished.

Even if the words the call agent gets are 100% verbatim, a lawyer can easily argue that a significant percentage of the message is in tone of voice. If that’s lost and the agent misses a nuance of the customer’s intent, they’ll have a solid case against the business.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I see no problem: they can record the original call and postprocess it with AI live for the operators. The recordings would be the original audio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Besides providing verbatim records of who said what, there is a second can of worms in forming any sort of binding agreement if the two sides of the agreement are having two different conversations.

I think this is what the part about the missed nuance means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

This is giving me Black Mirror vibes. Like when that lady’s consciousness got put into a teddy bear, and she only had two ways to express herself:

  • Monkey wants a hug
  • Monkey loves you

I get that you shouldn’t go off on customer service reps (the reason you’re angry is never their fault), but filtering out the emotion/intonation in your voice is a bridge too far.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Most of the time angry customers don’t even understand what they’re angry at. They’ll 180 in a heartbeat if the agent can identify the actual issue. I agree, this is unnecessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Based on my experience working in a call center, I wouldn’t call it unnecessary. People are fucked up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not an easy job, and it can absolutely be rough and frustrating. But knowing what your customer is saying is pretty important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I did phones in a different century, so I don’t know whether this would fly today. But, my go-to for someone like this was “ok, I think I see the problem here. Shall we go ahead and fix it or do you need to do more yelling first?

I can’t remember that line ever not shutting them down instantly. I never took it personally, whatever they had going on they were never angry at me personally.

Then again, I do remember firing a couple of customers (“we don’t want your business any more etc”) after I later became a manager and people were abusive to staff. So you could be right, also.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yep, 100%.

In college, I worked at a call center for one of the worst Banks of America (oops, meant banks in America 😉). Can confirm that, and I dealt with a LOT of angry customers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I think I get what the article is saying, but all I can imagine is Siri calmly reading to me the vilest insults ever written.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

If they’re going to do this, then customers can get support via text messaging right? They’re not going to have to call in to talk to a computer to have their voice turned into text for an agent right?

This isn’t about asymmetrically wasting the time of the customer so they don’t call support at all, right?

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments