How will this be any better than colourless-hydrogen-powered trains?

Just build some power line SMH my head

Hydrogen is a stop-gap resource that is being pushed by oil companies to continue both producing destructive energy sources and slowing our transition by wasting money on less efficient projects.

“As at the end of 2021, almost 47% of the global hydrogen production is from natural gas, 27% from coal, 22% from oil (as a by-product) and only around 4% comes from electrolysis.”

• source

Everytime someone hears or talks about or supports hydrogen we should cautiously assume oil companies are funding the project and it’s worse than other already established solutions.

Will there be a place for hydrogen? Yes, probably in several niche or minority cases. But it won’t be good for 90% of cars, trains, energy storage, etc because in each of those situations we have a clear path to full electrification or cheaper less harmful solutions that don’t require an oil/gas byproduct.

Oh, I thought hydrogen was colourless. TIL.

I haven’t been on that train for a while but I thought the entire line was electrified, the three stations and parts of the line definitely are. Either way it doesn’t make sense to me to build up hydrogen infrastructure instead of electrifying the sections of rail that aren’t yet. Can’t be that much in Germany. In parts where it just isn’t possible for whatever reasons why not install a few batteries?

Imho hydrogen on trains is only a good idea, for long distance trains running on not electrified track. Hydrogen is more energy dense and easier to refill then a battery so a good idea for say US freight trains.

However Germany has all its mainlines electrified. In this case all three towns have electrified main stations. Battery trains are a good solution for that relativly short sections of unelectrified track, as long as charging can be done in stations. This would be the case here, as in most of Europe to be honest.