88 points

Gods I hope so. The amount of damage he did convincing people that vaccines cause autism is incalculable. Especially to people on the spectrum.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

His chances were essentially nil to begin with. The only reason he’s even being discussed at all instead of being lumped in like the other no-hopers is because he has juuuuuust enough support to be able to make either Trump or Biden’s math slightly more difficult.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Was announcing that he (literally) had the brain worms supposed to be good for his campaign? This seems like the sanest trend in politics for at least a decade.

permalink
report
reply
-17 points

Are you claiming he announced this as part of his campaign? The misinformation around this brain worm stuff is pretty astounding, as are people’s glee in dogpiling over it.

Because facts do matter:

  • RFK Jr found and removed the brain worm 15 years ago.
  • It’s an incredibly common parasite which most often is contracted in large scale livestock farms, the kind of which he was litigating in the 2000s.
  • Almost 2 Billion people have or have had this same parasite in their lifetimes.
  • The story was resurfaced earlier this year in May once it became apparent he was a threat to the Trump campaign, by the New York Post (owned by Fox News Corp).
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Worm found (dead) but not removed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Also the deposition where he revealed the dead brain worm was using its damage as an excuse to pay his divorced wife less alimony because he had reduced mental capacity to earn with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for the correction!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

NYT also used it and I believe they’re the ones who broke the story first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Couldn’t tell who was first, made a best guess on the article dates I dug up. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did you write this or was it written by your brain worm?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Brain worm

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

He wasn’t ever going to get elected; the big question was whether he could serve as a spoiler and help elect Trump.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

I don’t get how it would help trump, RFK Jr is such a right-wing nutjob, I don’t think anyone who would vote for Biden would vote for him instead. Its much more likely to pull votes from Trump instead since he’s just the right kind of nutjob to appeal to the extreme Q-Anon supporting far right who would otherwise vote for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The idea was basically that having the name Kennedy and touting his environmental work (from before when a worm ate part of his brain) would suddenly induce a bunch of Democrats to vote for him. So he got to dine with billionaires and they tossed him money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Meanwhile, every single other living Kennedy denounced him and endorsed Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s not running on a platform of pre-brain-worm or environmental work, he’s running on an extremist platform, and anyone who votes thinking he’d be an alternative to Biden, probably also has a brain-worm, and will be a very small minority compared to the people voting for him because he’s an alternative to Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think it was also to capture the crowd who maybe disliked Trump, but didn’t feel like they could go Biden. His running gives these people someone other than Biden to vote for. It’s the reason Trump’s backers have been funneling money into his campaign (his “supporters” haven’t). And and vote not for Biden helps Trump either win, or with building support for his next insurrection upon losing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t underestimate the otherwise liberal voters who have been part of the anti (measles) vaccine movement for decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s psychology.

The most common reason people keep giving for voting Biden is “not trump”. And lots of people don’t like trump, but will never vote for any Dem.

If there’s literally any other options, it’s easier for someone to pick one rather than leave it blank or write in a name.

2020 was insanely close and decided by a handful of states.

It’s a weird situation where for most people their state is decided before the first vote is cast, where other states it could come down to 4 digit votes.

So things that seem like they’d have no effect, can actually be huge.

Like, RFK can cost Biden 10% in Cali, and it doesn’t matter at all. But if he costs 0.1% in Michigan it could change the election.

We need to switch to popular vote for president, but it’ll probably never happen. Until then random stupid shit like rfk can decide elections

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I can’t see a world where RFK costs Biden a higher percentage than Trump in any state, that seems like FUD being spread by bad actors. I am not saying anyone here is a bad actor, I am just thinking that people are fearing the worst possible outcome and bad actors are praying on that to push an agenda and because of Wizard’s First Rule (“People are Stupid. People will believe anything because they want to believe it or because they are afraid it might be true.” [Amusingly that quote comes from an Author that if he were still alive would probably vote for Trump]) it spreads, just like most other misinformation.

You can’t just say he’ll cost Biden 0.1% in Michigan without also considering how much he would affect trump, if he costs Biden 0.1% and Trump 0.9% he still only gets 1% of the vote, but it hurt Trump 90% more than it hurts Biden, which in the end will actually improve Biden’s position. And the newly (within the last 4 years) never-Trumper republicans who would never-Biden as well who votes for RFK Jr can’t be counted as a “biden” vote since they would never vote for him to begin with, if anything its a vast majority of 2020 Trump votes that are shifted to RFK Jr.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Right wing nut jobs think Trump is a superhero out to stop an evil organization of worldwide pedophiles. They were always voting for Trump. Nothing he did was going to change that. On the other hand leftists are easy to trick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Funny thing is, he was so closely aligned with Trump’s ideas, the only people I ever heard say they planned on voting for him were my MAGA relatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My wife is lefter than democrat and she was contemplating voting for him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It seems the editors weren’t able to reach his worm for comment

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

I’m no RFK supporter, but that shit was muckraking by NYT. Granted, I question his choice in using the excuse of having a worm in his brain to avoid paying alimony to his ex-wife, but it wasn’t being reported honestly and they acted like this was some new revelation that happened in the last few years rather than well over a decade ago.

RFK is not electable, but I will concede that I like three of his positions quite a bit:

  • Money out of politics
  • Housing and barring corporate ownership of single-occupancy homes
  • Cutting defense spending

He’s got so many issues that keep him from being a serious contender, but those three subjects are important and he stands on the right side in that regard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He’s a whacko but I agree with you on those 3 items, nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 315K

    Comments