67 points

Old, angry, white men wanting to control women’s bodies…a tale as old as time.

People like this are scared and weak. They can’t handle a strong, opinionated woman or someone on equal standing on them, so they must strip away their rights. It’s fucking scummy.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Men who are inferior to their fellow men, are always most anxious to establish their superiority over women. -Mary Wollstonecraft

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

But the other guy is getting a bit up in years. That’s why we must vote for the rapist that wants to turn the country into a fascist theocracy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

To some extent I guess I can understand the anti-abortion stance, but an anti-IVF stance along with it is wild. It’s adding people. You’re literally proclaiming an anti-life stance while you claim to be pro-life.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

It makes sense if you see their views as being about controlling women rather than being pro-life. The common thread of conservatism is removing agency and power from everyone but themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Exactly. Conservatives are the “us” that the law protects but does not restrict, and everyone else is “them” who the law restricts but does not protect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’ve backed themselves into an ideological corner.

For years the right has campaigned against abortion on the premise that “life begins at conception”. Because of this stance IVF puts them into a tricky situation: continue to maintain their extreme view that life begins at conception and oppose IVF, or accept IVF and concede that life doesn’t begin at conception.

If they accept IVF then that undermines their entire argument against abortion, which is obviously not a choice you make if your goal is to make all abortions illegal. So conservstives take the ridiculous stance that IVF embryos are babies, and since some embryos are lost during the IVF process, IVF must be murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I wonder how they reconcile that with eggs that get fertilized naturally through sex yet don’t implant on the uterine wall? Wouldn’t that also be murder according to their definition?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Honestly I think they’re just to pretend like that doesn’t exist. I would be interested to hear their stance on it though.

There isn’t a lot of self consistency with the conservative logic around abortion. Abortion is murder to them, but they drive by abortion clinics every day and do nothing. You’d think a building dedicated to murdering children would demand a stronger response.

Abortion is murder, but it’s okay to murder the child if it wasn’t conceived under the right conditions.

Abortion is murder, but we can leave it up to the states to decide when it’s murder and when it’s okay.

Just a lot of mental gymnastics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Same thing with people who are 2a obsessed and claim to be pro life at the same time. Ya can’t have fantasies about killing somebody and then turn around and claim you are worried about the sanctity of life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They’re upset about all the unused embryos that the IVF process usually creates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Someone should sit em down & teach em about how inefficient sex is at it too… but then again that’d require them to listen/learn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Someone should tell them that Muslims are happy to use IVF and Catholics that oppose it mean less Christian kids. See how quickly they make a 180 on that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Pops to low! Better ban IVF for people that want to have kids.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I read it as “hangs anti-IVF protesters” and thought wtf based

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Weirdo.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments