78 points

The people in every one of these Starliner threads seemingly hoping for the worst case scenario to occur just so they can dunk on Boeing for it are disturbing

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

It’s a weird moral grey zone. Everyone has forgotten the hundreds of people Boeing murdered as a result of their desire to skirt modern safety regulations. I just flew my family across the country yesterday on one of these end-stage-capitalism products for lack of any other option.

Were I to be ash this morning, I would be forgotten too.

But if astronauts were killed, maybe the outrage would finally be enough for all the greased palms to be sheepishly shoved in pockets just long enough to get justice, ground all those affronts to safety, and jail enough executives to maybe make Boeing stop being a global safety risk and a national security concern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Call me crazy but hoping for two innocent astronauts to die on the off-chance things improve isn’t something I would consider morally gray.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But if astronauts were killed, maybe the outrage would finally be enough

Nope. The news would die off in less than a week, short attention spans and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Lol. People want Boeing to fail, because they’re corrupt, lying, poorly engineered pieces of shit riding on bribed politicians. They’ve already deliberately caused the deaths of hundreds of people due to willful and deliberate negligence to save a buck.

Nobody’s wanting the astronauts to die. And they won’t, they’re safe on the space station, and there are multiple options to get them home safe even if they have to abandon the POS Starliner to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m not talking about people who just want Boeing to fail, I’m talking about the ones who think the best path to changing things is if they publicly kill two astronauts. eg. See the “morally gray” comment below

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The best case scenario is that boeing is put out of business and nobody else dies for some CEO’s paycheck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Seriously, some of the comments and their phrasing actively gave me flashbacks to my days on stan twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I wish Stan Twitter had never started his company, at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That is clearly a meaning of “not stranded” I was previously unfamiliar with.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

They’re not. The ship has 1 bad thruster, but need like a dozen to fail to make re-entry impossible. They could leave right now and everything would be just fine.

The thing is the module that’s malfunctioning doesn’t survive re-entry, so the only time to investigate the problem is before they head back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If I were thw astronauts I’d refuse to take the starliner back down.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Boeing:

Guys!! Good news! You’re not stranded! We just can’t get you back for a couple of mo…er…weeks! Yeah! That’s the ticket!

Astronauts:

permalink
report
reply
7 points

“Apollo returns, a Boeing story”

"Huston, we have a problem… "

…ok we figured it out, now guys you’ll have to build a few things. First thing, you’ll have to go into the garbage disposal and using plastic bags please collect small bundles of poop. Mix the poop with hydrochloric acid and make them into hexagonal shapes 6" tall by 2" thick. Now we’ll need one of you to get the flu… Go find a vial left by the ruzzians. Don’t worry, we got the antidote down here. Okay next collect all the snot and mix it up with 10% gelatin. Finally, you’ll have to go outside and patch the heat shield using the gelatine as glue…

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

Totally not stranded, according to Boeing.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

They aren’t stranded because there is the emergency capsule to get them back.

Classic corporate doublespeak and half truths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

They’re not stranded because the part of the capsule that isn’t working has multiple redundancy and is intended to burn up on reentry anyway.

Starliner is perfectly capable of leaving the ISS whenever they want, but they would be unable to continue collecting data on the thruster shutoff (again, because it would burn up in the atmosphere).

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Completely untrue. There are currently only 3 human-rated spacecraft docked to the ISS and none of them are set aside as some sort of emergency capsule. There’s no trickery here. The number of astronauts on board is equal to the number of seats available for them to ride back home in. The only reason they aren’t stranded is because Starliner is still fully capable of undocking and taking them home whenever necessary. If it wasn’t, then they would actually be stranded with no alternative way back beyond straping them to the floor of Dragon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Getting strapped to the floor of a Dragon sounds like a great plot for a space thriller

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Except the “emergency capsule” is all of them, including Starliner. Because Starliner is perfectly capable of returning to earth safely.

Because every thruster that has shut down has hot fired okay, and the known helium leaks still leave enough margin to cover several multiples of the 5 hours or so of RCS operation that you need to get to landing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I thought one thruster has been permanently disabled now? Not that that’s a major problem, but it does eat into their redundancy somewhat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, Boeing hasn’t killed them in a fireball of death, hurtling at 18 thousand kph to the earth. The media has this totally wrong, for now. Everything is totally fine, at this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As long as they didn’t bring any whistles with them they’ll be fine!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just pining for the microgravity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments