Edit: thank you for all information, it is really helpful ๐ I will check out pixelfed (.art) and go from there, maybe later setting up something โat homeโ ! Thanks again !!!
Hello !
I just got asked for a link to my paintings, and well I donโt have an art portfolio online and after trying some free ones out, I havenโt found anything nice (ease if useno nag-ware) so I thought of Devianart where lits of good pixel artists hanged around some ten years ago โฆ
But I have heard Devianart is no longer recommended or the goto place for your portfolio, is that so (or not ofc!) and if, do you have any recommendations for a free online portfolio? Say 30-40 paintings tops.
Iโm thinking about setting up something myself so self hosting (FOSS) recommendations are greatly appreciated too!
Cheers!
If you want to self host with FOSS, you could try something with good olโ Wordpress. It also carries the bonus of apparently being able to federate (I never got this working โน๏ธ)
I highly recommend using Pixelfed. It looks really nice, is easy to use, is FOSS, decentralised and federated, and is a really positive space. Itโs designed as a sort of Instagram replacement but whereas Instagram is used as a โsocial mediaโ advertising platform, Pixelfed is all art and photography. I actually find it to be one of the only genuinely enjoyable and uplifting parts of the internet at the moment and have discovered loads of art through it that I love and am inspired by. Have a look at some user profiles on a few instances to find one that looks like how you want to present your portfolio before signing up to one, as there may some variety between instances.
If you donโt mind doing a bit more work, itโs also not too difficult to set up a wordpress website on a cheap VPS using YUNOhost.
For ease and goodness I think Pixelfed is unbeatable though :)
PixelFed is also part of the FediVerse and uses ActivityPub, meaning people using Mastodon clients can follow PixelFed accounts.
You can run it yourself, but if youโre not able to for whatever reason, there are a ton of established servers.
I only have experience with pixelfed.social which is my home instance. I think youโll be fine with any general purpose instance though. They should all federate well, so your home feed will be made up of accounts and hashtags that you follow which can come from anywhere on the fediverse, not just your own instance. Itโs well worth exploring and getting a nice feed for yourself based on people and styles/mediums/subjects that you like. Itโs also good to comment on others work and keep the encouraging/supportive vibe happening :)
DeviantArt has been declining over the past few years due to controversial design changes and, more recently, a push for genAI garbage.
A lot of artists Iโve seen have recently been going to https://cara.app/ , although itโs relatively new and itโs unclear if it will last.
If you want something ActivityPub, you can also consider finding/hosting a PixelFed instance.
Cara has it in their terms of service that they gain the shared copyright of anything posted on their website. Nothing in their terms of service says they canโt open a store and sell prints or even sell the data to an AI company.
Cara is literally one of the worse places for artists.
What are the terms that say that? I just want to be sure because every few years I see uproar over misinterpretations of some social siteโs terms of service saying โwe have the right to modify and redistribute your workโ, when all it means is that they can host and make slight modifications to the files you post.
Tos: https://blog.cara.app/terms
The closest thing I can find is the following:
The Cara Site and all works of art (โArtโ) and/or other user generated content (including without limitation commentary, images, third-party links, and similar content and/or works) (collectively the โArt And Other User Generated Contentโ), text, data, and other materials contained in the Cara Site are copyrighted unless otherwise noted and are the property of Cara and/or the individual artist who created any individual piece of Art And Other User Generated Content (the โArtistโ). No such materials may be copied, reproduced, republished, modified or used in any way except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.
Which doesnโt actually grant any copyright; it just explicitly states that the artist remains the copyright holder.
There seems to be a weird hateboner on Instagram for Cara, for unsurprising reasons.
are copyrighted unless otherwise noted and are the property of Cara and/or the individual artist
The hateboner is justified. For all itโs faults, instagram explicitly says it doesnโt own any of the pictures and only has a license to display which the user can revoke at anytime.
Deviant art has this in itโs TOS:
DeviantArt does not claim ownership rights in your works or other materials posted by you to DeviantArt (Your Content).
It might be due to plain incompetence and not malice but their TOS lets them do a lot more than most platforms.
It also has rapidly-ballooning expenses with basically no income model other than a donation link.
I want a decent new art platform as much as everyone else but Iโm not moving my entire portfolio over to a new service that, honestly, looks like itโll be dead in 6-12 months.
I want a decent new art platform as much as everyone else but Iโm not moving my entire portfolio over to a new service that, honestly, looks like itโll be dead in 6-12 months.
It might be worth self-hosting your own website.
Yep, after 18 years on dA, I closed my account there yesterday.
I had about 2000 photos or so, but a year ago I got too pissed off at how slow and annoying it was to navigate, so I set up an index page on a webhost and use digiKam to create albums.
I update the index page in HTML/CSS and link to the albums.
The albums does have some javascript, that is to enable arrowkey navigation, else it is just pure HTML and CSS, and it is blazingly fast.