Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

105 points

Regardless of one’s opinion of the current situation, that he is considering it is a good thing. There are probably no good options, but if the pros and cons are weighed and the conclusion is that Biden endorsing someone else is the better choice, then that’s what should be done.

Regardless, voting this November is about voting against fascism, regardless of who the Dem candidate is.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I still want him to go full Dark Brandon and save his race by being a complete and unmitigated lunatic pointed at Trump and the GOP.

BUT…

…if you all want him to drop out, you need to push collectively. He has given in before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I’d prefer him to stay in if, realistically speaking, he is capable of doing so.

However, I also recognize that, even if he IS capable of doing so, he has not inspired confidence in the electorate in being capable of doing so. That alone may mandate his replacement even if all it was was a bad night.

I don’t think he’s in rapid decline - but if he is, or if he isn’t but feels he cannot convincingly portray himself as well going forward, stepping down might be the right choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I think what’s really put strain on his mental capacity is the campaign. It’s one thing to be in a demanding position as an elected official, at his age, but then add on all the campaign stops, speeches, and events. It’s too much for most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

HA! A reasonable take. Thank you! Sometimes it really does feel like I’m trying to convince a wall to not stand in the way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Samesies. But seriously, my man Joe is asking for four more years of a very physically punishing job. He doesn’t need it like some deranged narcissistic sociopaths we could mention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The dark Brandon stuff is 98% fluff, talk, and meme. Biden has already said that they’re going to take the high road on the presidential immunity matter. So, we’re going to high road all the way to fascism while waiting for Biden to do the meme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tbf, that’s exactly the sort of thing you would say before, during, and after a state sanctioned assassination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

He should do both. Abuse his new powers to somehow cause a sever detriment to Trump or Fascism or both, then be like ‘Oh im not the guy for the next four years.’ It would literally be having your cake and eating it two. Biden actual having balls and Biden stepping aside are both moves that will more than likely track super hard with anyone who’s not already locked for Trump.

Scorch Trumps earth then drop the mic and the chances they call for a Democratic encore will skyrocket I’d bet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If he steps down it would be the perfect time for him to be dark brandon because of he’s attacking in the right ways trump couldn’t help by focus on bidden and not the new guy, trump might even take resources meant to attack the new guy to hit back at bidden

I really want biden to dangle a parden over trump’s head and call him out for taking oil money because he poor

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

stepping down would be the ultimate dark brandon move. he could honestly become vice president instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Michigander here to tell you that Whitmer is a fantastic option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

She is almost exactly 8 years younger than Harris. If Biden flat-out resigns over this, I expect President Harris to nominate Whitmer as her VP. I look forward to that hearing in the House (since they have to approve the appointment too, although they will likely just sit on it.)

Imagine Harris-Whitmer for 8 years, then Whitmer-someoneyounger for 8 more

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Harris is not a viable ticket head.

The sturm und drang of this is gonna be a friggin nightmare if they don’t do this cleanly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Whitmer-Polis if we’re doing fantasy football

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol, in that scenario picking a new VP requires confirmation from both house and Senate.

Do you think the house GOP would confirm anyone? Or keep the spot open and just have Speaker Johnson next in line?

How do we feel about a woman of color as president with the next in line being a christo-facist? What’s the presidential odds of assassination, 14%?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think anyone seriously expects Biden to resign over this, but there is still a chance he’ll announce that he’s no longer seeking reelection, like LBJ in 68.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The only way it can possibly go down is to pick Harris. Biden already picked Harris as his understudy. And all those votes for Biden in the primaries were also implicitly for Harris, given Biden’s age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Harris doesn’t inspire confidence for me, but she may still be the better choice. Regardless, if she’s the Dem candidate, she has my total support for this election, because I would very much like a choice in every election of my life going forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think pushing the first black VP aside could go more poorly than people expect. Whether or not we like Harris (I don’t), shes been a loyal VP this whole time and I can’t imagine she’s going to like having her only shot at the big chair taken away from her. I think keeping Harris as VP no matter what is the best path forward. You keep some continuity, you don’t really piss off any voters, and you keep everyone unified. A unified front is the only possible way any of this will work. If everyone fractures and infights until November we’re still fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Fat chance, but Harris could be selfless and participate in the pragmatic realpolitik that we need in order to save the country. I am not sure who’s the best candidate, but I imagine that someone not directly tied to the Israel debacle would be good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
2 points

Yes. I so want to continue ignoring her. It’d be typical of the DNC to do it though, because she cannot win, and they fucking love that for some goddamned reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m glad he’s taking it seriously. It looks like the next few events he does are going to be really important in determining his next steps. If they go badly, I think he drops. If they go well, he’ll probably stay in.

I also 100% believe that Biden is fully aware of this article and likely encouraged the NYT’s source to approach the media. Part of evaluating this whole thing is going to be gauging public opinion and testing the waters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Michelle Obama could drop in and win in an instant in a landslide.

8 more years of Obama is music to the world’s ears.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No she couldn’t. Voters like her now because they don’t know her as a politician. They would find issues as the campaign progressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

You’re aware who she sleeps with to get to where she is?

It would be Barack-redux magnified, and she can appoint the kids to positions, just like Trump. Nepotism back atcha!

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

I do not give a fuck who is D on the ticket. I’m still voting D because the alternative is disastrous. If Biden stays, I am voting for him. With the exception of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, the administration has been very competent. Remember, that old man doesn’t do much. The work is done by his team. Now think back on the work and damage the Trump team did. The choice is easy.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

The work is done by his team

And this is really important. He’s got some kickass people he’s appointed. Id vote for Joe just to keep Lena Khan at the FTC. All those people get replaced by fascists in the event Trump wins again. Unlike last time, every single member of his administration is going to be a loyalist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’ll vote d no matter what. I’d take a dead d over a live r.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Thank you! It drives me nuts that this isn’t the key takeaway in every post and article I see. On one hand we an amped up old man who would sell out his family for a dollar, let alone the rest of us who is friends with dictators and thinks they’re really sharp people with good ideas, and is also a convicted felon who surrounds himself with other current or future convicted felons, and has been saying for years he wants to imprison or hurt his critics. On the other hand, we have a barely older, regular old man who at least has good intentions, hires competent people, and who makes mistakes but admits to them and learns from it, who happens to be very stereotypically old man. How people are making this an apples to apples comparison is insane.

This behavior with Joe didn’t start at the debate. It’s the same Joe we’ve had for years. And this isn’t new, even for people younger than Biden is.

Guardian, 2008: Fatigue and racism threaten to knock Obama bandwagon off the road

Barack Obama was showing signs of campaign fatigue. Sitting on a picnic bench in a park on Pagoda Street, Indianapolis, in discussion with a group of 30 supporters, he told a story about the “modest” background of himself and his wife, Michelle. And 10 minutes later, seemingly having forgotten, he told them it all again.

It is hardly surprising, given that he has been on the road almost non-stop since Christmas, battling Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination. In recent weeks, he has often seemed absent-minded, forgetting the names of the towns he is in.

Tiredness is the least of Obama’s problems. After a relatively smooth and well-planned march towards the Oval Office, his campaign is facing its greatest crisis. “He is in the middle of a shit storm,” one of the journalists travelling with him said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

With the exception of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, the administration has been very competent.

Two exceptions: Biden’s refusal today to use the power the SCOTUS decision gave him to rein in the court is also incompetent (not to mention, suicidal).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Is that the buccee’s squirrel? That place is amazing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep. I used to live in Austin, plus I don’t fly so I drive everywhere. Buc-Cee’s and Cracker Barrel are my refuge on the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What if it’s Manchin or Sinema?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

And genocide is just an american government thing. You don’t become president of the US if you aren’t willing to play ball.

But if you don’t become president then you don’t have the power to enact that change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

First and foremost: The New York Times has a very well known anti-Biden bias https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/04/25/new-york-times-biden-white-house-00154219

Second: While it is very important to understand that not all sources can go “on the record” this… is purely a rumor from an unattributed source “close to the president”.

So can we please stop cheering on russian/ccp/trump propaganda?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Absolutely true. But they also understand running this particular story isn’t their usual, harping, crypto-republiQan article.

I think (unless they’ve decided to go full evil), they actually have this source who actually heard Biden say that. That’s really all we need to know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh, are we allowed to point out media bias now that it’s against neoliberals? I can’t keep up with the rule changes, progressives have always been attacked for pointing that out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

If Joe Biden sticks around and manages to win, he’ll be remembered as a pretty average president. If he sticks around and loses, he’ll be remembered as a politician whose arrogance hurt the whole country.

If he withdraws without more fuss, he’ll be remembered as an extraordinarily decent and humble man, especially among politicians, regardless of the results of the election.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

If He steps side and the next D loses, it would also be biden’s fault for throwing away his encumbancy advantage.

Remember, whoever gets chosen to replace Biden, even if it were Ronald Reagan, or mitt Romney, Trump and company will say they are even more liberal than Biden and will take away guns, force all women to get post 9 month abortions etc. And Maga, conservatives will believe it since there’s no evidence to the contrary. With Biden, he hasn’t fine those things these past 4 years. He’s Only “done a bag job”

I feel like Biden is in a difficult situation and voters are partially to blame for electing Biden in 2020 over another younger/healthier candidate (i voted Bernie who is old, but seems healthier than Biden in some ways).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

(i voted Bernie who is old, but seems healthier than Biden in some ways).

Because Bernie has universal healthcare in his heart

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If Joe Biden sticks around and manages to win, he’ll be remembered as a pretty average president.

Hardly. What is that based on? Are his accomplishments boring to you?

Oh, I see you’re just making the case for him to withdraw. Eh, fair enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Well, yeah, I am making the case for him to withdraw. I think he’s a very good president and if he remains the Democrat candidate I’ll vote for him. I just don’t think enough people feel the same way for him to win.

His accomplishment are, indeed, boring to the average voter. His agenda was the Democrat agenda. It was the right agenda, in my opinion, but any Democrat president would have been about the same. Willingly stepping aside, on the other hand, would be a noteworthy gesture of humility that we don’t see often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s pretty disheartening. People had a better opinion of the economy when me and my friends could only get jobs that paid in experience for 5 years.

But in that case, even during the highest unemployment, most people still had their jobs so to them the only difference was things were cheaper, people were willing to do things for you for less money (or free of you’d tell your friends how helpful I was).

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I mean whether it’s true or not is one thing but there are plenty of articles about how poor his administration has been at communicating victories. That would prolly play into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I’d vote for a bag of Biden’s toenail clippings over Trump. Stay in the race or leave, I don’t really care, so long as they’ve got a winning strategy to follow. Trump has done enough damage to this country - let’s not give him another round.

I wish only the best to not-Trump, whoever that ends up being.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments