He’d get my vote…

94 points
*

Unfortunately Al Franken was sacrificed by leading democratic women on the wave of me too, on accusations staged by the Republicans.
Because Al Franken was one of the absolute most effective voices against the Republican madness.

Hello Gillibrand. Are you happy now? Did this boost your career like you hoped it would?

permalink
report
reply
41 points

That was ridiculous though, and media pressure shouldnt have forces his resignation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I 100% agree, Al Franken was amazing at framing things and putting them into perspective. The sacrifice of him was a huge misunderstanding and completely undeserved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Well, a staged photo with the subject in full knowledge is far, far worse than anything done since then, right? Right?? (this was what got him booted iirc)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The drumbeat from so-called feminists and the “liberal media” would have just kept on going until he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean sinema?

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Nope, Kirsten Gillibrand was a senator from NY who led the charge in calling for Franken’s resignation

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/al-franken-kirsten-gillibrand-2020-1014697

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I will never forgive her for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

If we’re going with a comedian, I’d sooner pick Jon Stewart. That is assuming he’d even want to do it.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

For what it’s worth, as it’s not clear if you’re already aware, but Al Franken was actually a pretty decent senator for ~9 years.

Jon has stuck his oar into political matters, but not at that level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Yeah and Al was good at it too before he got sac’ed for a dumb gag photo!

Jon is probably a bit more eloquent and has an impeccable moral compass. I’ve got a good feeling he’s smart enough to know he doesn’t know shit about most things but would during himself with people that do and would listen to them on those matters.

Also, he doesn’t want to do it which makes me think he’d actually be good at it. He’d recognize it as a mostly shit job that needs to be done well and not as some sort of self-aggrandizing accomplishment after decades in politics. Something about true leaders not seeking power but having it thrust upon them I guess :>

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Jon / Al ticket would be amazing they are both smarter and kinder than any politican out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Bernie and AOC are very good too. There are probably others, USA has a lot of politicians. It’s impossible to know but a fraction of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bernie is older than Biden, and AOC doesn’t know anything about foreign policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

In that respect it makes it easy then that 95% of them stride on the party line with no conviction of their own and never waver from what daddy DNC tells them to do, making them generic, forgettable, and unimportant.

It is the exact same for the right except with more outliers that try to be blatantly worse human beings than the others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I like Bernie but we’d be running into the same cryptkeeper problems before long too.

AOC while I agree with her on most things doesn’t really come off as particularly charismatic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Al/Jon would work better. I think Franken would do better in the Oval Office while Jon would shine cracking the whip as President of the Senate. Might be able to get some work out of those bastards for a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Jon Stewart tearing into the Senate on a daily basis for four years would heal my soul

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I like Jon too much to make him president. Trying to get health care for 9/11 first responders aged him a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh fuck yes. I pick Jon over Al any day, just as I’d pick the either over Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

After 4 years of Trump, I’m done with celebrity politicians for the rest of my life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I mean if Al is going to take over this country anyway, might as well be this one. Or the weird one.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Is it time for an Al/Al ticket?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Me? I’d vote for him. Liked what I saw while he was in congress. Still think it was bs how he was pushed out before any actual investigation was done, if memory serves me correctly.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

It was another case of Democrats following the rules, setting an example of decency only for Republicans to go “Hm neat! Anyway, here’s a rapist for president”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Let’s go. Either him or AOC.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Al + AOC for veep

She is 35yo on Oct 13th and fully eligible

Though she is inexperienced in foreign policy, she’s quick to get up to speed on all things it seems

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t want A.I. for president.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 315K

    Comments