Gotta love a shitty repub SCOTUS. Its awesome.

178 points

Fuck Texas, residents of the state can keep their fucking non-competes if they love them so fucking much… elsewhere let’s move ahead with this fucking awesome policy.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

If your company has PTO hours and you leave your job in Texas they don’t require you get paid out those hours so they are just lost. My coworker learned that. Absolutely need better worker protections across the board and Non-competes getting tossed is huge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Honestly, if you’re choosing to live in Texas at this point you should expect to have very few personal rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

… do you just expect everybody who lives there to pack up and leave? Even though their entire lives might be there and moving costs a ton?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Fuck Texas. Anytime I hear people complain about “Democrat policies” around me, I just wish they’d move to their utopia in Florida, Texas, or any of the other “who’ll come up with the stupidest bullshit freedom-encroaching laws next” red state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Workers leaving states like CA for Texas are like anti-vaxxers who think vaccines are stupid because they don’t know anyone with polio.

If our country survives for another couple decades, they’ll be so proud of themselves for “inventing” all the same worker protections they left behind. But not before experiencing their economic polio first hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

It’s just another bullet point in a half century long problem.

The FTC is an independent Federal anti-trust enforcement agency. After SCOTUS 1977 Continental TV v. GTE made the nuance of certain contact terms subjectively legal, allowing mergers likely in the interests of global competition, the FTC has been effectively neutered. The only significant action has been the breakup of the Bells in 1982 and some Microsoft anti-Netscape gibberish around 1999.

The FTC has effectively lost every significant case it’s brought since about 1970. Consumers haven’t had any significant protections since 1982, more than forty years ago.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

I’d like my digital persona and its data to be an EU member, please

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah, it does seem like enforcement is a futile exercise that’s permitted to happen for performative purpose while nothing gets done.

This sort of capture is pretty standard in other federal regulatory domains.

You either regulate pro industry or you won’t regulate at all. There is really no solution being proposed or really this sort of things is not even knowledged in these circles since people are making careers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points
*

Weird cause I’ve got the FTC act right here. Says this:

(a) Declaration of unlawfulness; power to prohibit unfair practices; inapplicability to foreign trade (1) Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.

And then later on it has this whole entire section where it lays out the process for how the FTC is supposed to make rules in regards to unfair or deceptive practices

Except as provided in subsection (h) of this section, the Commission may prescribe– (A) interpretive rules and general statements of policy with respect to unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce (within the meaning of section 45(a)(1) of this title), and (B) rules which define with specificity acts or practices which are unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce (within the meaning of section 45(a)(1) of this title)

And more sections about how they can enforce those rules on individual rule breakers.

Sure sounds like congress was trying to give the FTC the authority to make rules about unfair competition. Both general rules and with “specificity” apparently. Specifically here, non compete agreements have been declared an unfair practice and they followed all rule making procedures as laid out in the law.

https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act/ftc_act_incorporatingus_safe_web_act.pdf

permalink
report
reply
30 points

You missed the news where the Supremos say they’re the only regulators that matter now. In the decision before that they legalized bribery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not bribery, just a surprise gift after doing a favor without being promised anything in return! Totally different thing, you guys!! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You know they’ll start pulling shit like ‘You do this new thing for me and I’ll tip you for that other thing you did for me in the past <wink>’

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

A gratuity of 10k. I guess for the corrupt members of the court, $10k and $10 are about the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yes, theoretically this should be fine even in a post-Chevron environment. Let’s see how it goes, though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

This is why we can’t have nice things.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

It indeed is! They’ve been packing the courts since Regan. The US court system is basically the real government now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

There’s so much bullshit going on in courts lately. It’s hard to keep up enough to know if something is good or bad. It’s starting to get fucking exhausting.

“court ruling blocks decision to block court decision to block court decision to ban plumbuses from not not being not sold in stores” - that’s every other court releated headline.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

To sum up: we recently got the awesome FTC instruction that noncompete agreements are disallowed in almost all cases.

Noncompete agreements keep workers from being able to work in their trained field just because they previously worked somewhere else in that field and had to sign a paper to do so. They’re a tool used to harm worker power; traditionally for knowledge workers, but now it’s being used all over the place.

The judge SC said, you can’t ban those. Noncompetes are cool and good. Fuck workers.

EDIT: This was a 5th circuit judge, so not the USSC. A little below that level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This is bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments