6 points

Duh… it’s just the next buzzword grift… blockchain, nft, AI… yes each one has a niche of a place but they’re not world changers people were making them out to be, just those were were trying to ride the bubble and get their money before it pops.

permalink
report
reply

The main difference I see is that blockchain and nfts never really made a huge splash in large corporations. Now we have the S&P 500 dominated primarily by tech companies that are dumping billions into AI and telling investors it will turn all their fantasies into reality. I don’t remember bitcoin ever motivating this level of institutional bedlam.

When those tech companies fail to breakeven on their ai initiatives, I think the deflating of the ai bubble may just trigger a major recession. Look at any target year retirement fund and Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, NVidia, Apple are all insanely large portions of the fund holdings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I personally think all those companies have enough cash and revenues (not tied to “AI” pitches) that we don’t have to worry about a US recession (with consequences for the the rest of us), but I could be wrong.

But one does wonder what happened to (US) corporate governance laws where such actions can be taken with no worry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I really don’t think they will. I know AI has some value because I use it often, but I really doubt it has that much value

permalink
report
reply
2 points

If limits on true intelligence are not overcome, it does seem like it’s reaching the state of a commodity. Just a competent enough level of service expected from any LLM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And if true intelligence is ever achieved then there’s a whole new set of concerns, such as sentience and robot rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My experience with “AI” is somewhat limited (image/video upscaling, occasional LLM use and fooling around with stable diffusion), but the true intelligence “AGI” sounds like a grift to get money from investors.

I could be wrong of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nah we just fire 50% more worker. Problem solved.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

You joke, but that’s their goal. That’s probably a conservative estimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe if tech companies didn’t put strangleholds on their markets they’d have better ideas of what people want.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The thing people aren’t talking about enough is the depreciation of all the GPU hardware. The $10B Microsoft spends on Azure GPU hardware may bring in only $5B in revenue, but they get to write off the cost against their taxes.

permalink
report
reply

Hardware

!hardware@lemmy.world

Create post

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Icon by “icon lauk” under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 1.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 356

    Posts

  • 462

    Comments