BRUSSELS (AP) — NATO leaders plan to pledge next week to keep pouring arms and ammunition into Ukraine at current levels for at least another year, hoping to reassure the war-ravaged country of their ongoing support and show Russian President Vladimir Putin that they will not walk away.

U.S. President Joe Biden and his counterparts meet in Washington for a three-day summit beginning Tuesday to mark the military alliance’s 75th anniversary as Russian troops press their advantage along Ukraine’s eastern front in the third year of the war.

Speaking to reporters Friday, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said NATO’s 32 member countries have been spending around 40 billion euros ($43 billion) each year on military equipment for Ukraine since the war began in February 2022 and that this should be “a minimum baseline” going forward.

“I expect allies will decide at the summit to sustain this level within the next year,” Stoltenberg said. He said the amount would be shared among nations based on their economic growth and that the leaders will review the figure when they meet again in 2025.

NATO is desperate to do more for Ukraine but is struggling to find new ways. Already, NATO allies provide 99% of the military support it gets. Soon, the alliance will manage equipment deliveries. But two red lines remain: no NATO membership until the war is over, and no NATO boots on the ground there.

At their last summit, NATO leaders agreed to fast-track Ukraine’s membership process — although the country is unlikely to join for many years — and set up a high-level body for emergency consultations. Several countries promised more military equipment.

84 points

Because NATO has never accepted applicants with active territorial disputes.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Yes this is one of the reasons Russian trolls talking points of NATO expansion fears motivating Russia to invade whiffed of bullshit from the beginning. By annexing Crimea Russia already made them ineligible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well,

in 2018 Ukraine voted to enshrine the goal of NATO membership in the Constitution. source

At the June 2021 Brussels summit, NATO leaders reiterated the decision taken at the 2008 Bucharest summit that Ukraine would eventually join NATO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Is “dispute” really the right word? Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yes because it started years before the war with the annexation of Crimea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The war started with the annexation of Crimea. It has been going on since 2014.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Ukraine is not a whipping boy and yet NATO seems to think it is.

If Ukraine had been allowed to keep their nuclear weapons none of this would be going on at all.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Ukraine could have kept its nuclear weapons… but Ukraine did not have proper leadership that could maintain such posture. These people would/could not run the state efficiently enough to fund a nuclear weapons program since they were mostly Russian plants looting the country. Corruption over national security has consequences… people need to hold their leaders accountable for their blunders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They couldn’t have kept the weapons. They were being guarded by Russian soldiers, and Ukraine never had the activation codes. They got the best deal they could giving the USSRs nukes back to Moscow, rather than risking Moscow blowing them up in-situ. Moscow threatened that at one point during the talks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

people need to hold their leaders accountable for their blunders.

Unless you’re an American president. In which case your own supreme court has ruled you can do no wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Give Ukraine back their nukes!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

A year? Feckless Americans holding back statements again, it seems. Europe is certainly in for the long haul. Also plenty of countries not ruling out boots on the ground. In fact the US not having a clear stance of “you use tactical nukes we’re going to put them onto Ukrainian soil” or similar is yet another instance of fecklessness.

You may think yourself smart and strategic but in the end you’re a salami, sitting there motionless, being sliced.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The US can’t commit to more than a year. Even a year we might break that promise. You gotta remember, we have an election in November. If trump wins, there’s no telling what bullshit he might do. He might even just nuke Ukraine.

You gotta remember, half of the USA is on russia’s side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’d ask Putin if he do it for him

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everything russia and their cronies fearmonger, EU and USA should do it.

Ukies puppets of west. We fighting NATO now already. Oooga booga Nooks!

NATO forces should have been in Ukraine a long time ago. All russia will do is be actually impressed, put a brave face on and moan of another Uncrossable Red Line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Let’s see what happens with all these weapons when the war ends… I expect a big amount of gangs will be well armed…

permalink
report
reply
5 points

And they will get spare parts how?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Africa

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

As is tradition. (Only sort of /s)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-59 points
*

Ukraine: Joins NATO. Russia: Runs for the hills. Ukraine: Everything goes back to normal.

The childish rhetoric and illogical manurisms of Zalinsky are profound. Its never dawned on you going to war with a superpower is extremely bad. Watching him go off and his emotional roller coaster the past few years has been painful. Defend your country. Here’s the support you need. But we aren’t stupid.

As for widespread corruption. Yeah. There’s lots of flags.

For every 100,000 dollar missle we send them that cost use 10,000 to manufacturer. We buy ourselves 9. You’re not even weaking our position.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

going to war with a superpower is extremely bad

Russia isn’t ready a super power any more and Ukraine definitely didn’t have a choice on getting invaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

Just like we didn’t see all this coronavirus shit coming. Nor could we ever do anything about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

wait wat

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
20 points

Right so you’re an expert negotiator that thinks you should never ever ask for more than you think you’ll get because you’re afraid some people on the internet will write that you have “childish rhetoric and illogical manurisms[sic]”?

Ukraine is currently using ATACMS rockets to soften up Russia’s air defenses in preparation for using the F-16s that’ll soon be arriving. It seems the “childish rhetoric” is working. I guess Zelenskyy will just have to accept that people that can’t even spell his name might think less of him. Oh well…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

Theatre. Very much so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Reads like a boomer tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m impressed you can read it at all. I’m not only unsure what OP is saying, but which side they’re on. The beginning sounds pro-Russia, but then at the end it’s the West that’s sending missiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 227K

    Comments