26 points

I might be a moron here, but I have no idea how to interpret this. Is each blue bar the proportion of streets that run in that direction? Do the ones that just have a single bar at N/E/S/W have perfectly aligned streets that only go in the cardinal directions?

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Here’s a portion of detroit:

The city is almost entirely grid, some of it at an angle. You can see these two grids visualized in the post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Seattle too has a section that’s perfectly n/s. It was built upon infill created by destroying larger hills, flattening the city and filling in the bays. The older city is canted off at a strange angle, you can see the streets change directions at denny way near downtown.

Outside the downtown corridor everything is aligned NS iirc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s my interpretation too.

Newer cities tend to be more grid like. Older European cities tend not to follow a grid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also, how is the direction assigned? Especially for streets that are not straight? For example taking a beginning and end and measuring their angle wouldn’t be very representative. And how does it work with long and short streets? Are longer more heavily represented, or do they count the same? I’d like it if it took a tangent to the street every 100 m or so, but somehow I doubt that’s what they did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had presumed it’s the angles of the intersections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So basically angles of ends of streets. Well, there are many options and we just don’t know which one it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This might not be the best representation if you’re trying to depict “good” cities. Madrid is famous for having a very centrally planned and carefully considered grid, and yet the graph here looks like a mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Fun thing is that in Montreal, ‘North’ is refereed to as the direction where streets go away from the river, which ends up being the WNW, further from north than “East”.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Heh, yeah I was gonna make people guess which one was “north” for Montreal

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Tulsa, OK is a trip. Perfect square mile grids for most of the city. Looks like a chessboard flying in at night.

Until you get out to the burbs, the streets are names crossed by numbers, everything regular… I used to navigate the whole town with one page from the phone book. Even when you get into numbers crossed by numbers, it still makes sense.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’m surprised New Orleans has any NSEW streets considering we say “towards the river” or “towards the lake” and the “West Bank” is actually east of much of the “East Bank” because of how the Mississippi turns.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

The part that really pisses me off in America at least, is that once you get outside the nice ordered grids of the city, you start getting into subdivisions. They start having all of these curved nonsense roads instead of again, nice straight grid lines. I understand that sometimes you have to divert around a natural feature, but that doesn’t excuse them deliberately making neighborhoods all twisty and grounded off so that it’s easy to get lost in there. Stick to the grid system. And if any European complains about it, remind them that [insert rival European country] is better than their own country.

permalink
report
reply

Data is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Create post

Be respectful

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 45

    Posts

  • 629

    Comments