145 points
*


Edit: paper link

permalink
report
reply
57 points

His other work was definitely more bombastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

he really blew up in popularity

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Shortcut for others like me who aren’t familiar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski a.k.a the Unabomber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Is it for portraying Jim on The Office? That show was such a success that he really exploded onto the scene

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He really turned a pipe-dream into a reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Probably his carpentry skills, man really knew how to build a cabin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

PDF warning for those on smartphones

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

“scandal noted”

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Came here for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m out of the loop, what’s the context?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

From Urban Dictionary:

Created by Pete Holmes, comedian. While referencing a celebrity in a conversation for their popular unique quality, but not in relation to a current or past scandal, saying “scandal noted” acknowledges the issue, and avoids a tangent in the conversation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

permalink
report
reply
15 points

On a somewhat related thought: There was a star trek voyager episode about using the findings of some war criminal to perform life-saving surgery.

The doctor ends up deleting the information in the end after the surgery and I always thought that was a seriously stupid take.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_Human

To me, even if information is obtained via awful means in the past, preserving knowledge is the far better choice in all circumstances, other than in the rare occasions where it will continue hurting others (not even sure when this would be the case).

And obviously upholding moral standards for research now and in the future.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Fruits of a poisonous tree: The idea is to not give these crimes justification and vindication. To prevent people from committing crimes in order to claim they did it for the greater good: some maniac could abduct and torture people and release the findings, accepting the consequences be it prison or death. But in their mind they are justified because their findings would help people eventually. If you don’t accept the findings, then the criminal has no justification because no, there is no greater good. you just committed crimes.

similar to the right to privacy preventing police from using evidence from unlawful searches. you found a body, but you didn’t have proper reasoning for the search so now the body doesn’t exist as far as the courts are concerned. because otherwise the police would violate people’s privacy all the time and eventually justify it by finding something.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 52K

    Comments