Not sure what others are doing to use Ubuntu (23.04) without snaps, but this is what I am doing:

  • for Firefox I found a guide here
  • for chromium I am actually using the Linux Mint packages (which work absolutely fine), and I have just set up a small repository I can add to apt:
deb [arch=amd64 allow-insecure=yes] http://snapless.cmeerw.net victoria upstream
  • this just syncs from Linux Mint and only republishes chromium in the Packages file (with downloads redirected to a Linux Mint mirror). BTW, I am not signing these…

What are others doing?

52 points

Running Debian. Snapless and Ubuntuless Ubuntu

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Now that Debian is will to ship “non-free” drivers and firmware, I think it has become far more viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It always did, though. Just unofficially.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Was it unofficial? I thought it was merely opt-in, but still official

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I switched two of our boxes over to Debian “Bookworm”. And so far, I am completely happy with the change. On desktop, it’s still a little rough around the edges, and a few oddities need to be ironed out here and there, but that’s nothing compared with the ocean of pain that were snaps for me and my company.

Still a little nostalgic, though, after 17 years of Ubuntu 🫠

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Snapless Ubuntu is called Linux Mint, no guide needed.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

but it’s limited to Ubuntu LTS versions

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

that’s not necessarily a downside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

How is only having an LTS version vs. having a choice between using an LTS version or a non-LTS version not a downside?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

True but it depends on your usecase- of you need all the fancy new stuff and want to move on quickly you should go another route instead of fucking around with forced software you do not want. Maybe Debian testing or Fedora? If you do not care about the newest stuff I guess Mint is a perfect fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Just use debian testing or unstable.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

This.

I just went from Arch to Debian 12 Bookworm. Running the stable branch, but so far most of the packages are rather recent. Kernel is 6.1 instead of 6.4, but I could switch to the Testing or Unstable branch to get the “bleeding edge” packages/kernels if I need to. But honestly so far it’s been a real pleasure to use. Everything is just working and is stable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Debian 12 was just released. Compare it to Arch even six months from now and see how current the packages are. Then compare it again in 18 months.

I am a happy Arch user but I must admit the constant kernel updates can seem a bit much. An experiment I have considered is moving to Debian 12 and using distrobox to get access to Arch repos and the AUR. I would use the Debian stuff as much as possible but for anything missing or anything that I really need to be more current, I could just fall back to the Arch repos.

It could be the best of both worlds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

FYI Arch offers linux-lts. You can install that and linux-lts-headers and switch grub/whatever your boot loader is to default to that and forget about running the bleeding edge kernel. Linux 6.4.x has been literal dog shit with several ugly amdgpu bugs and suspend is randomly borked about 1/3 of the times I try to suspend my PC for the evening (and issue I’m not experiencing alone).

So, yeah. Give the linux-lts linux-lts-headers packages a try. You get the benefits Arch’s cutting-edge packages on a stable kernel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I switched from Arch to Debian Stable as well. I grabbed the Xanmod kernel repo for a more recent kernel, and use Flatpaks and Homebrew for some cutting edge stuff. I don’t miss anything from Arch so far.

permalink
report
parent
reply

don’t miss anything from Arch so far.

same I switched to debian testing. best experience. never had issues since a year. Arch usually borked once in this period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Debian testing works fine for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just use Debian Stable

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He mentioned wanting more up to date packages. I like debian stable, but it’s not exactly known for being the latest and greatest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He can get single packages from a different source without sacrificing the whole system

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

My solution is using a distro that doesn’t try to force snaps on me.

If you want the ubuntu base, why not use mint?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Mint would be based on Ubuntu 22.04, but I’d like to have something more up-to-date. I believe all other .deb based distros have the same issue that they are not as up-to-date as Ubuntu 23.04?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

None of them are like arch where you can read news about an update and find that you just have it installed already.

Given you’re on ubuntu and therefore not at the bleeding edge anyways, it won’t be a big difference. My personal choice for stuff that just needs to work is debian. I carry debian LTS with the full KDE pack on my ventoy and it’s been great. I also heard very good things about testing and Sid, but I haven’t tried them myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 170K

    Comments