UPS’s tentative labor deal with the Teamsters hasn’t even taken effect yet. But it has already taken a bite out of its earnings and revenue, as both fell in the second quarter ahead of the deal being reached.

78 points

If you’re company isn’t profitable enough that it has to underpay its workers to profit then your company should fail. UPS is huge. Theres no way they cant afford it.

Pay your workers a decent wage you philistine.

permalink
report
reply
-50 points

How much do you think they’re paying them? I worked for UPS like 10 years ago and even then they were paying very high wages. “Decent” wage is a subjective term. These unions will keep coming after the company year after year to increase wages until they drive them out of business, which isn’t good for anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Bootlicking like it’s an Olympic sport

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Ah yeah because anyone in favor of sensible resolutions is a “bootlicker”. What a great conversation. Goodbye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Mechanics make very good money with ups because of the union. This specific negotiation was for part time workers and drivers, negotiating higher base pay for all part timers and drivers, AC in drivers trucks, and better benefits.

The contract for mechanics and pilots will largely remain the same because again, these are some of the more lucrative jobs at ups.

The union ceases to exist without the companies that have unionized. What you are saying is antithetical to the idea and nature of a union.

The CEO of ups made $19 million last year. I think they can afford to pay her less and their actual workers more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

What you are saying is antithetical to the idea and nature of a union.

Yes that’s correct.

The CEO of ups made $19 million last year.

That’s because THEY’RE THE CEO. Skilled workers make more money than unskilled workers because they provide more value. That’s not wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What was your position at UPS?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I was a mechanic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I heard with the new deal they will be paid $170k including benefits. That’s a lot of money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

That’s a fuckton of money for unskilled labor

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Fuck it! I don’t give a shit. Let its profit fall. Its already making a shit ton of money per year. How about forcing the CEO to take a goddamned pay cut!

permalink
report
reply
41 points

If treating your employees correctly causes you to lose money, then your profits weren’t real and you were just playing Jenga with your company’s assets to line your own pockets.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

makes me wonder if this profit thing might be linked to exploiting workers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

And?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

And stocks fall so people get big mad. Crazy how speculative markets basically rule policy and public opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

The headline makes it sound like it was because of the Teamsters deal. Typical liberal ploy. The article summarily points out two factors for lower revenue. 1) Customers that went with competitors to mitigate risk in case of a strike and 2) lower volume of sales due to shift in consumer spending habits toward “travel, movies, eating out and live events”

And if you thought there was any reason to be nervous about anything, no. It’s truly business as usual.

Despite the lower revenue and earnings guidance, the company said it expects to stick with its plan to pay $5.4 billion in dividends and repurchases of $3 billion in shares.

🙄

permalink
report
reply
16 points

What makes it a liberal ploy exactly? Like I agree with everything you said, but I’m not sure what context the word “liberal” in your sentence means or is referring to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Liberal in this context refers to economic liberalism. Ostensibly for free market competition, (but in practice just a political deference to capitalists in opposition to labor or other social goods) it is the ideological backbone of capitalism.

In the US, while “liberal” is colloquially used to describe the Democratic Party for its relative social progressivism, both major political parties follow economic liberalism to justify their policies which favor the rich.

A liberal will side with capital over labor. Therefore, in this context, a liberal will use language that frames the shift in surplus value from corporate profits to labor as a total loss to the economy rather than just to the company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Makes sense, and you are right about where my brain went to. I was thinking this just sounds like capitalist bull shit, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Literally the 2nd to last sentence of the article. Talk about burying the damn lede.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean, even without revenue decreasing, profits are going to “decrease” because money that will go to increased pay and benefits to workers would otherwise go to greater profits. So even leaving out the fearmongering about lost revenue, the title and significant parts of the article (about profits and margins) is taking the liberal path of calling it a bad thing due to sympathy with capitalists instead of workers.

So yeah: how about a fuck you UPS, and a fuck you CNN. Nothing new, but always bears repeating.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Socialism

!socialism@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules TBD.

Community stats

  • 908

    Monthly active users

  • 720

    Posts

  • 3.1K

    Comments

Community moderators