In 2023, Google and Microsoft each consumed 24 TWh of electricity, surpassing the consumption of over 100 nations, including places like Iceland, Ghana, and Tunisia, according to an analysis by Michael Thomas. While massive energy usage means a substantial environmental impact for these tech giants, it should be noted that Google and Microsoft also generate more money than many countries. Furthermore, companies like Intel, Google, and Microsoft lead renewable energy adoption within the industry.

Detailed analysis reveals that Google’s and Microsoft’s electricity consumption — 24 TWh in 2023 — equals the power consumption of Azerbaijan (a nation of 10.14 million) and is higher than that of several other countries. For instance, Iceland, Ghana, the Dominican Republic, and Tunisia each consumed 19 TWh, while Jordan consumed 20 TWh. Of course, some countries consume more power than Google and Microsoft. For example, Slovakia, a country with 5.4 million inhabitants, consumes 26 TWh.

150 points

I don’t see what’s surprising here. They provide services for users globally. Not that it’s justified, it’s just kind of weird that people think global scale computing is light on electricity, apparently

permalink
report
reply
61 points

All of that AI crap they keep pushing certainly doesn’t help the energy consumption though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

For sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Lots of people were just yelling the grid can’t handle more load like for charging cars while Google adds a country worth of power use with AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Google builds entire datacenters with their own transformers and power lines, if not their own powerplants. You plug these datacenters directly into the high voltage networks that don’t have big capacity problems.

The low voltage grids in residential areas on the other hand were build as cheap as possible, so increasing the load by 20% is already too much for most of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The low voltage grids in residential areas suburbs on the other hand were build as cheap as possible, so increasing the load by 20% is already too much for most of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Don’t forget to set you AC to 80 because the grid can’t handle the load lol. That’s exactly why this info is important, ecological solutions are somehow always trusted on individuals when the vast majority of the issue lies with corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those corporations are serving users, they wouldn’t need all that power if billions weren’t using their services

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s not surprising per se, but it’s something that people should be more aware of. And a lot of this consumption is not providing global services (like the Google search or workspace suite) but the whole AI hype.

I didn’t find numbers for Google or Microsoft specifically, but training ChatGPT 4 consumed 50 GWh on its own. The daily estimates for queries are estimated between 1-5 GWh.

Given that the extrapolation is an overestimate and calculating the actual consumption is pretty much impossible, it’s still probably a lot of energy wasted for a product that people do not want (e.g. Google AI “search”, Bing and Copilot being stuffed into everything).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

To put a bit of context on those, 50GWh is a single medium sized power station running for 2 days. To create something that is being used around 10 million times a day all over the world.

At 10 million queries per day that puts the usage per query at 100-500 Wh, about the amount of energy used by leaving an old incandecent lightbulb on for an hour, or playing a demanding video game for about 20 minutes.

As another comparison, In the USA alone around 12,000 GWh of energy is spent in burning gasoline in vehicles every single day. So Americans driving 1% less for a single day would save more energy than creating GPT4 and the world using it for a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

They only do that because they project it to be profitable, i.e. they project demand for it.

It’s also ridiculous to claim that people don’t want it just because you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The thing here also is that I can’t see that they have taken into account that they deliver data center services globally.

So say that my company have 100 VMs in azure. That energy usage should count for our company and country, and not Microsoft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It sounds scary, and that’s all that’s needed to get clicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Google originally made a name for themselves by building a global search engine on low cost, low powered desktop machines running in parallel, so it’s surprising because they have gone from high-efficiency to power hogs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Who said they are not efficient? They just serve buildings of users. I would be surprised if they didn’t figure out how to do it more efficiently than Bing PER REQUEST. They have PhDs sitting around thinking how to lower power consumption by 1%

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not surprising at all. Power hogging is the whole point of capitalism. It’s just literally electric power in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Showers worldwide use more water than …

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

It’s OK, I sort my garbage to make a better world. Evens it out.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Yeah, and we’re all using paper straws now, so it’s double evened out

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I still drive my SUV beside all the Prius’ on the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Lol, and here’s me with my non-Prius hybrid evening that out:

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You also use Gmail and force Google to run their servers to power it.

Reducing your carbon footprint as much as possible is important, but it’s absurd to get mad at companies that power 90% of the world’s businesses for using a bunch of power to do so. It takes power to do those things. Get mad at the companies who are over consuming relative to their peers and those that are driving demand towards unattainable activities. Just getting mad at people for moving and using energy is absurd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I just wish we never got to this point to begin with. We shouldn’t have trusted all our keys to a single cool startup in the early 2000s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To be honest, one single company running all the infrastructure is probably way better on the environment than millions of small providers

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

it’s absurd to get mad at companies that power 90% of the world’s businesses

It’s absurd to actually think that this is what’s happening. wow.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/02/googles-carbon-emissions-surge-nearly-50percent-due-to-ai-energy-demand.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Microsoft posted a revenue of $211.9 billion for 2023. Keeping in mind that the vast majority of the world’s population uses Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office and loads of online applications run on Microsoft Azure, the economic impact of Microsoft’s products is probably counted in trillions of dollars.

Comparing this to countries with the same ballpark energy consumption, Azerbaijan’s GDP was about $78 billion, Slovakia’s GDP was around $127 billion, and Iceland’s GDP was approximately $30 billion in 2023.

The economic output of Google and Microsoft by far exceeds these countries’ GDPs, highlighting the vast financial scale of these tech giants relative to their substantial electricity consumption.

Oh yeah, it’s crazy to think that! I don’t know where I would have gotten that idea, other than the article that OP linked that we’re all discussing.

Yes, training new AI models uses a bunch of power, so does building out any new infrastructure. Atleast Microsoft and Google use a far high percentage of renewable power than most other industries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Evens it out

Flattens out the blowjob

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Google has 4.9 billion users while Microsoft has 1.6 billion active devices.

I think comparing them to small nations is dumb but it doesn’t seem extreme when you take into account the huge amount of users (half the planet uses google everyday)

In any case, it’s up to the government to make sure our grid is robust and runs on renewables. Microsoft is building it’s own nuclear reactor because the government is so fucking inept. This is a scape goat.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

They’re doing what??

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
4 points

A BSOD in a reactor control system… just what the world needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Microsoft is building it’s own nuclear reactor because the government is so fucking inept.

lmao. oh yeah I’m sure that nuke is gonna be hella secure.

https://www.propublica.org/article/microsoft-solarwinds-golden-saml-data-breach-russian-hackers

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I originally read that as ‘Google and Microsoft hold more power than most countries’, which is also true.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Very true. I’ve seen how politicians of some countries do a complete lap-dance whenever a FAANG company entertains the thought of building a datacenter in their territory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Weird metric, but pretty sure UGGs or KitchenAid hold more power than Lichtenstein or Tuvalu, so not unique to tech giants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s definately cheaper to have some in-house power plants than to pay utilities for the electricity more often than not, and hydroelectric or battery storage might also be cost-effective at times, although I’d say a bit less so than generation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It would be more helpful to compare their power consumption before and after AI adoption.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments