45 points

No Republican I’ve talked to will admit this.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

They generally don’t know. It’s difficult to pierce that bubble

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s not that they don’t know. It’s that they choose to believe oil barons over scientists.

These people believe whoever has the most money is the smartest, or at least they act like that is what they believe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Well fuck… I guess one way or another our lifestyles will have to change. Either by severe action to mitigate climate change, or by the impending climate catastrophes things are going to be unpleasant.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

We’re too stubborn. We’re gonna throw shit into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

We’re Corporations are too stubborn. We’re They are gonna throw shit into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight.

FTFY

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean I think it’s cool as shit if it works. It’d be pretty lit if we managed to fuck up so badly and avoid murdering a bunch of poors to fix it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve been saying for two years now that you cannot convince me that there isn’t a ready made contingency plan somewhere in the White House that involves using modified nuclear weapons to facilitate a mini nuclear winter, to counteract greenhouse gas emissions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m saving my bottlecaps.

Really we just need a relatively cheap (and relatively non-toxic) chemical that’s more reflective than our atmosphere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yeah either by sever action years ago or by things being unpleasant. With sever action now making things less unpleasant than they otherwise could be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

People can’t keep blaming every case of wildfires on “arsonists” forever

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I mean most of them are, but does it matter? Heat waves and drought create conditions that make the fires as critical as they have been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You’d think so. On another completely unrelated note, isn’t it unusual that every unarmed minority who gets killed by the police in an egregious enough way to garner public outcry totally deserved it for committing various offences that bear no relation to the killing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

is it possible to somehow summon the tldr bot here? anyone know?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

The article is fewer than 2,200 words and is definitely worth the 10 minutes of your time to read in full.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

oh I read the whole thing, I just thought it would be helpful to have a tldr

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Media isn’t reporting on climate accurately, and science aren’t speaking up enough because of ridicule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks! I actually read the article itself, just thought it would be helpful to have a tldr

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

I’m surprised they didn’t mention a key tipping point I’ve been following: melting permafrost.

It’s dangerous because once all the permafrost in Alaska, Canada, and Russia starts melting, the gasses it releases are a self fulfilling prophecy. The warming caused by permafrost melt is enough to keep melting permafrost.

Good report on the dangers here:

https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1110722

Current estimates are that an increase of just 1.5°C in global temperatures over average would be enough to hit this tipping point and we’re already at +0.8.

https://worldbusiness.org/permafrost-the-climates-tipping-time-bomb/

Continuing to increase at a rate of 0.08°C per decade means we’ll hit this in approximately 80 or 90 years? Except that, since 1980, we’ve been warming at a rate of +0.18°C per decade, so we should hit the tipping point by 2062, tops.

Eh, what do I care, I’ll be 93 years old, assuming I’m not already dead by then. :)

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Thanks for sharing the knowledge

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

I mean…this is the same thing they’ve been saying for years. That’s the “point of no return,” because the warming is exponential. Decades, they’ve been saying this.

But, here comes the new fucking DIRECTOR OF THE U.N.’S CLIMATE EXPERTS saying, “1.5c warming is not the end of the world.”

He said that shit, like, last week. We really do need to put the workforce into building guillotines. The world needs some guillotin’ing.

He added: “Nevertheless, we should not despair and fall into a state of shock when the world exceeds 1.5 degrees.

“Every action we take to mitigate climate change helps. Climate protection is always cheaper and protects people from the dramatic consequences of global warming. This is all the more true if we have exceeded the Paris climate target.

“The world won’t end if it gets more than 1.5 degrees warmer. However, it will be a more dangerous world. Countries will struggle with many problems, there will be social tensions.

“And yet this is not an existential threat to humanity. Even with 1.5 degrees of warming, we will not die out.”

The context for this is that he thinks the “doom” coming from climate alarmists will paralyze people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

“Not an existential threat to humanity” is a pretty low bar. I’d prefer no increase at all to mortality rates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

But even the lowest bar he could set isn’t true. We need the air, the water, the plants, the animals, the not-forest fires, the not-monumental hurricanes and tornadoes, the lack of drought and the lack of torrential flooding…all of this is already ramping up, literal centuries before they predicted. THAT is how much we seem to have misjudged how desperate this situation is.

Like, ten years ago, he story was, “if we don’t stop, our children’s children will start to see some extreme weather events.” And then it was, “when this generation grows up, we will have a much harder time.” And now it’s, “holy shit, it’s already happening.”

And this fuckin turd comes out with some bullshit platitudes. Gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did he watch the movie Don’t Look Up and go with the script word for word?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Oh, if you want to pee your pants, watch the Arctic Sinkhole episode of Nova that’s available on the PBS Nova YouTube right now. Terrifying examination of the current state of permafrost.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Is this the one? Thank you for the recommendation!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=HvKpnaXYUPU

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep! They rotate full episodes of Nova in and out so I’m happy it’s still up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 477K

    Comments