US presidential candidate, Jill Stein, says because of AIPAC’s $100 million funding of the US election, it has become '‘politically toxic’ to speak out against the genocide in Gaza.

‘If we have concerns about the right to life before birth, how about a right to life after birth,’ she said in reference to Israel’s killing of innocent children and the elderly in Gaza. US President Joe Biden 'can end this war with a phone call’, she added.

28 points

And that is why she isn’t a serious or viable candidate.

And she never has been.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Oh, she isn’t a serious or viable candidate for way more than that, not least of which is the fact that she’s a Russian asset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

So I doubt you know the state department released a statement saying nothing nefarious happened while she was seated at that table for a few minutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I actually tried to find the State Department statement on that, and couldn’t. Do you have a link?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So she wolfed down all that food and a glass of wine in just a few minutes? Impressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

she’s not a russian asset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh well that settles that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Reagan did it with one phone call to Begin, calling the invasion of Lebanon a Holocaust. While Biden privately supported it in 1982 saying he would go further than Israel.

Source on the Reagan phone call to Begin: https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/13/world/reagan-demands-end-to-attacks-in-a-blunt-telephone-call-to-begin.html

Source on Biden saying to Begin he would go further: https://theintercept.com/2021/04/27/biden-israeli-invasion-lebanon/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because something that happened 42 years ago is relevant today.

Gee, I wonder of the world and politics and power dynamics are different today.

Hmmmmm 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It is relevant. It proves Biden could stop the genocide in Gaza but just like in 1982 he doesn’t want to. When Reagan angrily called Begin’s actions a Holocaust, Biden was privately saying to Begin he would go even further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Hey guys, I’ve seen this several times since entering this thread so it must be true!

Fuck off with your spam

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

It is cited and you can verify the source for yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

If she doesn’t take the AIPAC dollarydoos and sell her soul she’ll never win is what you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Pretty much, yeah. For multiple overlapping reasons (FPTP, media, campaign funding). Which is why reforming the system is critical.

Kind of makes it weird that so many people on Lemmy are like “the system is broken therefore I’m not voting even if the outcome is Trump coming to power and making it 10 times worse.” In my type of logic, “the system is broken therefore let’s reform the system by doing X Y and Z” would be more sensible, to the point that it kinda calls into question their motivations behind saying the first thing, but what do I know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Shes on enough ballots to get past the post. Maybe it’s time democrats did it our way since your way keeps producing brain dead geriatrics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

In my type of logic, “the system is broken therefore let’s reform the system by doing X Y and Z” would be more sensible, to the point that it kinda calls into question their motivations behind saying the first thing, but what do I know.

And the way to fix the system is by empowering the people that have broken it down over the years?

When the DNC took away Bernie in 2016 they destroyed the entire argument of “changing the system from the inside”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

It’s true. She’s speaks truth to power and is therefore kept out of political discussion.

Israeli military is funded by the US. They are given weapons. They are given logistical and intelligence support by the US. They are given diplomatic support. They are trained by the US. In almost everything but name, they are a US force. They would not exist without US support.

Joe Biden can tell them what to do at any time, and he chooses to ok the genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s an interesting take considering where her campaign money comes from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Truth to power? Shes Putin’s number one fan, and has been for a decade+.

Jill Stein is a bought and paid for russian asset. Her only role is to cause turmoil in american elections however she can, by hopefully siphoning off left leaning votes in key states. She did just that in 2016, a year after this putin meeting, where her vote totals in key swing states were higher than the total margin for Hilary’s loss. Her efforts were part of why Trump won in 2016, leading to all the chaos and turmoil we have today.

Her trying to cause division and sow discord in the left wing during this election is the exact same thing she did in 2016 and 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Ah yes the infamous dinner she had with Russian notable. Having a dinner with a foreign power obviously means you are a paid spy to disrupt elections. Lots of dots to connect there!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The president can’t just unilaterally withhold Congressionally approved aid. You may recall Trump was impeached for doing exactly that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

They gave a joke of a candidate like RFK Jr USSS protection and none for Jill whos polling higher than him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

No, he can’t, because Bibi doesn’t give two shits what Biden or the Americans think.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Also because he can’t withhold any economic/military aid that Congress has approved to be sent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bibi relies on Biden to veto any United Nations action against Israel.

Bibi couldn’t do what he’s doing if he didn’t know Biden is on his side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Reagan did it with one phone call to Begin, calling the invasion of Lebanon a Holocaust. While Biden privately supported it in 1982 saying he would go further than Israel.

Source on the Reagan phone call to Begin: https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/13/world/reagan-demands-end-to-attacks-in-a-blunt-telephone-call-to-begin.html

Source on Biden saying to Begin he would go further: https://theintercept.com/2021/04/27/biden-israeli-invasion-lebanon/

Biden doesn’t want the genocide to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Begin was rational though. Different times, different people. That was the whole thing with the Camp David Accord under Carter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Begin wasn’t a rational at all. He was a war criminal responsible for some of the worst massacres in 1948. Even then he was better than Biden.

Begin said he was shocked at how passionately Biden supported Israel’s invasion when Biden “said he would go even further than Israel, adding that he’d forcefully fend off anyone who sought to invade his country, even if that meant killing women or children.” Begin said, “I disassociated myself from these remarks,” adding: “I said to him: No, sir; attention must be paid. According to our values, it is forbidden to hurt women and children, even in war. Sometimes there are casualties among the civilian population as well. But it is forbidden to aspire to this. This is a yardstick of human civilization, not to hurt civilians.” The comments were striking from Begin, who had been notorious as a leader of the Irgun, a militant group that carried out some of the worst acts of ethnic cleansing accompanying the creation of the state of Israel, including the 1948 Deir Yassin massacre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I wish there was a simulator that we could put people in. It’d be good for Lemmy argument participants, too.

Like Jill Stein puts on the helmet, gets on the phone with simulated-Netanyahu, he laughs in her face and says okay we can wait until November, suits me fine. She cuts off weapons, congress explodes, it’s all over the news, some Israeli soldier talking about how his unit got decimated because they didn’t have the right stuff (all horseshit of course), Biden’s polling drops 5 points, Stein hits the button to switch the nominee to Kamala Harris, the polling drops even more, congress overrides Biden and sends weapons anyway, Trump wins the election with 350 electoral votes and sends Israel 20 strategic bombers and a carpet-bombing configuration of munitions with a note that says “have fun ❤️”, simulation ends. 0 points

(I’m not trying to give Biden a free pass on support for Israel. I think regime change and support for the ICC would be a good way to go; we can defend our “ally” (for some fuckin reason) while still prosecuting the members of that ally’s government who are killing children. I’m just pointing out that, of course, Stein’s argument here is laughably naive.)

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
*

Reagan did it with one phone call to Begin, calling the invasion of Lebanon a Holocaust. While Biden privately supported it in 1982 saying he would go further than Israel.

Source on the Reagan phone call to Begin: https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/13/world/reagan-demands-end-to-attacks-in-a-blunt-telephone-call-to-begin.html

Source on Biden saying to Begin he would go further: https://theintercept.com/2021/04/27/biden-israeli-invasion-lebanon/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bro stop fucking spamming. Don’t know about reddit, but we don’t like that shit here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

She would designate AIPAC correctly as a foreign entity and suddenly nobody really cares about israel anymore. We would never allow Russia or China to influence American voters with this kind of insane propaganda apparatus.

Biden controlls all “leverage” israel has over him

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m gonna make a simulator and then put you in it so we can test your assertions about how it works, and give you a score at the end

Also

We would never allow Russia or China to influence American voters with this kind of insane propaganda apparatus.

I’m not saying you are wrong about how it should work, but I also have bad news for you about where the GOP gets a lot of their money and priorities

And no that is not some hyperbole

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I’m not saying you are wrong about how it should work, but I also have bad news for you about where the GOP gets a lot of their money and priorities

Tell me who is that? Surely the DNC doesn’t accept money from those people right?

And Biden isn’t president too right? He has no power to anything about AIPAC.

Instead of running simulations try observing this thing called “reality”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Doesn’t even have to be a phone call…

He just has to draw a line in the sand and say Israel gets no more weapons till they’re on the right side of the line.

Obama did it. Biden said it was dumb, but it worked.

Now Biden isn’t doing it, and Israel went on a full on genocide.

But Biden will never under any circumstances do it, so Israel knows as long as Biden is in office they can do whatever they want.

trump would want money/favors/praise, and if push comes to shove, he’ll abandon them in an instant if he thought it would be better for trump or if Putin told him to.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points
*

Reagan did it with Begin with one phone call. Biden is just a Zionist and it is his genocide. Just like how he did in 1982 in Lebanon while Reagan called it a Holocaust.

Source on the Reagan phone call to Begin: https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/13/world/reagan-demands-end-to-attacks-in-a-blunt-telephone-call-to-begin.html

Source on Biden saying to Begin he would go further: https://theintercept.com/2021/04/27/biden-israeli-invasion-lebanon/

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 437K

    Comments