138 points

Maybe you shouldn’t have made it so shit

permalink
report
reply
75 points

Listen pal - Do you know how hard it is to make legs for a wii-like avatar?! We need another 8 billion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They’re called miis 😤

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hello, I am a friendly ghost coming to attend your serious business meeting in the Metaverse. Did you know that this is going to be a massive industry? Buy your Metaverse real estate now, it’s definitely not a fake digital asset that Facebook can create and delete at will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Cutting spending by 20% while not reducing output will definitely accomplish that, too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The tech in general just isn’t good enough to do that much more. It’s like having a coal powered steam engine and then saying you’ll build a formula 1 car with it. They thought that with throwing enough money at the wall, a few breakthroughs in tech would fall out, but it doesn’t work like that. If you’re very lucky you hit one breakthrough, but they needed a few.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sounds like the intial pitch probably went something like this, except they weren’t realistic about the timeline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Can’t watch the clip in my country, but it’s a common enough theme with tech bros. Theranos also comes to mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe you shouldn’t have made it so shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

90% of technology companies quit before making a hit VR product. We should encourage Meta to spend more.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Let’s hope Meta sinks every last dime of their profit into “the next big thing” that is their VR division

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’d much rather see meta burn money into the fun project that is VR rather than AI or crypto.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Meh, the problem will always be that Meta will use its VR platform as a data vacuum first and foremost, which makes it a nonstarter (at least for me)

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Well, if I didn’t have to make a face book log in to use one. If not for that I would consider one to play in steam. Even if I had to have it tethered.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

That wouldn’t be better for the company. They probably don’t make money on selling the hardware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yeah, that’s the entire deal of it. And why it’s lame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Same sentiment except additionally I will never buy anything from Facebook because they are radicalizing people.

Not going to buy an Apple Vision either if it won’t behave as a generic screen for any OS.

I am utterly sick of the account requirement and proprietary connector bullshit from every company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am still so incredibly salty that my quest 1 is a paperweight because of this requirement.

It did not exist when I purchased the product. Full Stop.

When they introduced to that requirement with the quest 2 you were able to use the quest one without it with no issue. Sometime last year we tried to hook our quest one up to Steam Link and were met with a Meta Account requirement. There was no way within the UI to get around it.

In a moment of frustration, wanting to play some Beat Saber with the family, I went ahead and started the process of making a meta account only to be stopped several times along the way by various privacy layers on our network. It was insane. My PiHole about caught fire.

30 minutes in I gave up and dug out the Vive Cosmos and all 20 wires it needed. So disappointed meta is the only wireless headse with decent battery life. They ruined VR adoption for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

I think they don’t require that anymore. It’s a “Meta login” which can be separate from Facebook. At least for Quest devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Call it what you want, but this requirement prevents me from buying their products too. I use no Meta services. Don’t wanna start.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points
*

Welcome to the classic social media 100m dash. Become a popular dunk target on socials > get people to call such and such choice as a dealbreaker > stop doing such and such > it is now “not enough”, or “they’ll enshittify it later” or “a slippery slope”.

Which fine, whatever. I’m not saying Meta are “good guys” (no corporation is, honestly). What I will say is a) that is not a particularly productive or functional way to engage with pretty much anything, especially when there is no comparable alternative to a product, and b) this is a remarkable incentive to NOT acknowledge criticism. I mean, if I’m Meta and I see this often, what is the incentive to not just force everybody to EULA away as much as possible? People will give me crap for it regardless, so I may as well get to sell some sweet, sweet data.

FWIW, I’m skeptical of the ability of Meta to turn around the VR market as a whole, I don’t like many of their privacy and content moderation practices and I no longer use Facebook, Instagram or Threads. But hey, I do have a Whatsapp account because it’s pretty much mandatory to exist in society, and I do have a Quest headset, which I agree is the best price to performance you can buy and works flawlessly with PC VR both wired and wirelessly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Not separated enough for me. I know all the big companies are bad, but I won’t touch google/fb hardware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

do you struggle to play peekaboo? how do you not grasp that they’re feeding into the same software ecosystem and your data is being stored in the same database?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The same jerks with a new name get the all your data. Bootlick harder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

[Publicly traded company] unhappy with how much money [division] burns. Suggests putting the money into stock buybacks.

Wow, this is some hard- hitting journalism that couldn’t possibly write itself!

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Even the buybacks are getting crazy when the P/E of these firms is on the order of 30-50. The big financial institutions just assumes these big companies have the growth potential of tiny startups and that they will forever and ever and ever.

Atm, Meta’s actually looking not-terrible with its 27 P/E ratio and $40B/year advertising income stream. So they’ve got plenty of room to fuck around and find out with VR and AI. But eventually, the fact that nobody is advertising on this shit (because nobody is using it) means they have to explain why they’re sinking hundreds of millions into a dead end.

That’ll force them to pivot to some other speculative source of infinite growth. Which will reignite the hype cycle for the Next Big Thing. But, in the end, its the steady monopolization of ad dollars in their existing franchise markets that they care about.

Incidentally, also why they need to shut TikTok down before it eats into their market share even further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

According to the report, the company’s chief financial officer, Susan Li, told staff the division has lost $55 billion since 2019.

$55 billion in losses over ~5 years? That’s a substantial amount.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Holy shit, give me just one billion per year and I’ll build you a sexier failure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

give me one billion period and ill build you a kickass vr set without bullshit, and ill probably have money spare for me and possibly descendants to retire. people underestimate how much money one billion actually is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

People underestimate how much a fucking Million is! It’s like a lifetime salary (3k/m for 27.8 years).

We should call billions thousand millions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Wow, that’s like half the total value of Nike!!!
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NKE/

Or about the same as Ford:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/F/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not a drop in the bucket of their revenues, though. This is really about someone feeling angst that they can’t get an extra quarter percent increase in profits for the quarter so that the dividends go up just so slightly.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments