Twice-yearly shots used to treat AIDS were 100% effective in preventing new infections in women, according to study results published Wednesday.

There were no infections in the young women and girls that got the shots in a study of about 5,000 in South Africa and Uganda, researchers reported. In a group given daily prevention pills, roughly 2% ended up catching HIV from infected sex partners.

“To see this level of protection is stunning,” said Salim Abdool Karim of the injections. He is director of an AIDS research center in Durban, South Africa, who was not part of the research.

The results in women were published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine and discussed at an AIDS conference in Munich. Gilead paid for the study and some of the researchers are company employees. Because of the surprisingly encouraging results, the study was stopped early and all participants were offered the shots, also known as lenacapavir.

93 points

Amazing. Hopefully this leads to eradicating HIV for good.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Have you seen gestures broadly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Yeah, I’m getting jaded as I get older. The optimist in me recognizes how ground breaking this is, and thinks there’s a real possibility of actually eradicating AIDS. The pessimist in me remembers covid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

if PrEP had been invented 25 years ago it would be banned

we’ve come a long way

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Haha, nicely put

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

If there’s profit to be made treating HIV/AIDS symptoms without curing, the profit motive health industry won’t like this. Solve the problem, their profits go away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I mean why do we eradicate any diseases if there is profit involved?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We can speculate very easily.

There’s a trade-off, cost-benefit analysys. If a disease is so catastrophic that it kills everyone fast, well you’re not gonna make profit off them ever, because they die. Cure this one.

What about diseases that can be controlled somewhat, and only affect small amounts of the population? What if for them to stay alive they have to stay on a regular concoction of expensive pharmaceuticals either forever or for a long time? And they can still go to work? Why cure this, out of altruism? That’s not how capitalism works.

Let’s just say, for shits and giggles, we could cure immediately the common cold and mild influenza, forever. No more cough and cold over the counter medicine needed, much less pain and fever reducers. Local pharmacies don’t need to stock this stuff anymore. The companies that produce and sell these are all tied to wallstreet. Getting colds doesn’t stop you from working (or buying/consuming). Shit, I work with “men” who are “tough” who never call out of work sick because “I’m not a pussy” (cultural hardwork ethic propaganda nonsense).

Etc., etc. You get my point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Then some other company will do it. Not all world is US and A. Is some areas like Europe the states would be more than happy to order those vaccines to treat their citizens. There’s demand made by public health organizations, there will be someone willing to join the race and eat that cake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Please make this affordable in the U.S.

I have a feeling it won’t be.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

But then people might have sex without fear! That’s bound to make baby Jesus cry!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

AIDS has been the most dangerous STD for decades. It has changed attitudes to sex worldwide. Having a vaccine is going to change them again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not to sell out my community but I know quite a few people whose condom use went down after they got on PrEP

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

40k per dose

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Wonderful!

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Republicans will work tirelessly to ban this in the U.S.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

twice-yearly

I wonder why they went with that, instead of saying bi-annually

permalink
report
reply
49 points
*

Is biannual twice yearly or every two years?

If you look it up, it’s both. IMO all these words are useless. Biweekly, bimonthly, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Instead of biweekly I specify fortnightly. Is there a bimonthly equivalent? Fortweekly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We should make it a thing. Let’s regroup in a fortweek and see how we’re getting on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you use the word fortnight, it’s likely you aren’t from North America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think it’s trended to mean every 2. The original commentator wants chaos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Bi-annually has the problem that it can mean twice a year or every two years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That would be semi-annual

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Yes. A bicycle has two wheels, a semicircle is half a circle. Biannual is two years, semiannual is half a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

English isn’t prescriptive, if enough people use it the wrong way then it becomes the right way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It is clearer. What I learned at work is to write documents in high school language so that everyone can understand them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For research studies you are unironically required to write consent forms so a middle schooler can understand them because that’s the average level of comprehension in the USA

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They could have gone with “every six months” too. I think any of them work, although as other say biannually can mean every two years as well, leading to confusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bi has trended to mean every 2 weeks/months/years/etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 285K

    Comments