In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
Schrodinger’s bait
This is far from the first time he’s said contradictory shit. Idk if he’s irony poisoned or just changed his opinion based on what pisses people off the most.
His views on Ukraine are very clear if you watch his videos like the 90 minute one about how the scientific consensus on the Holodomor is that it wasn’t a genocide, but since a lot of people in here get irrationally angry because of the smallest criticism of AES (while claiming to be “critically” supportive) and starts to cry fed they are a very easy target to troll. After this i am even less convinced that his Venezuela video was serious (which would be good because it was awful).
After this i am even less convinced that his Venezuela video was serious
I don’t buy this. He clearly fucks with people on Twitter but putting the effort into a whole video to just subtlety troll people is less believable. He still occasionally contradicts himself in his videos but significantly less often, I think what he says on camera is much closer to whatever his actual views are.
I think his actual views are somewhat informed by what pisses off the people he hates is the thing.
Sorry but if the video is a “joke” then he is doing a Vaush where he can pull a “just joking”, this is pathetic, my man is lost in the irony swamp.
Lmao you are the person that always used to defend SDF and the US bases in Syria.
Disregard this chauvinist people, they’re a habitual NJR defender and succ sucker
Bad Empanada has good videos, but the worst takes on Twitter sometimes. I had to block him for my sanity.
Bad Bad Empanada
He is very clearly joking.
Yeah if you watched his videos on Ukraine and saw him dunk on NAFO libs on twitter it’s pretty clear.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Yes, that’s the video i referred to in my other comment, thanks for enlightening me tho.
I didn’t see your other comment but personally I’m not getting a read on the irony or humour in that video. Maybe it’s just me or because I don’t follow BE closely enough to know more.
chauvinists always do this shit instead of arguing their point, because you know it’s not defensible
