83 points

c/dataishorrifyinganddepressing

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Seriously! I had no idea so few people voted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If it makes you feel any better, the trend looks like more people are voting as time goes on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

As crazy as it is, Donald Trump appears to have been the single largest motivator to vote in American history. Either him or Covid.

He has definitely motivated me to vote twice, and for the rest of my life I won’t miss an election. Seriously. I had voted before, but I’d sit it out if I was too busy or I didn’t particularly like either candidate.

I have happily voted for Mr. or Ms. Not Trump twice. Now I also have to vote for Mr or Ms Not Influenced by Trump every chance I get too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

George Floyd too. 2020 definitely felt like the boiling point for a lot of things that centered around Trump in a 100% divisive way.

I did a protest vote in 2016 (my state has zero impact), but from now on I want to make sure the numbers show accurately who got the most votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Very sad indeed, I will try my hardest to recuperate the DNV score.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

The government should partner with McDonald’s and offer a free double cheeseburger with proof of voting.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Election Day should be a national holiday to give folks a chance to vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Pay for postage for mail-in voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No postage needed in California, nor Massachusetts if I recall correctly. Does your state really make you find a stamp to vote in 2024? That sucks, sorry to hear that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, at least put it on the weekend, like other countries (or at least mine).

Allow early in-person voting centres and postal votes. Make it convenient.

Though, maybe these are only widespread in mandatory voting counties (like mine), because you’d get massive complaints if it wasn’t convenient.

Turnout is unsurprisingly, very high here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Who would run the polling stations and run public transit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You don’t have public transit on national holidays and Sundays? Next you are going to ask who is going to work in hospitals and restaurants

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Those deemed necessary could be given a day off to early vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The government should pass a law that it’s required to vote, or give a reasonable explanation why you can’t. Employers are punished for keeping their employees from voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Hi, it’s me, Australia, you might remember me from such democratic innovations as the secret ballot and mandatory voting, America will never have mandatory voting because it works about as well as gun control, single payer health care, and the metric system.

Also many places have mandatory voting but very few enforce it, I would put money on America being one of those places if it somehow got a foothold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Its actually illegal to do this. Yes, that’s stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It should be whiskey like the founders intended

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

That is.

It reminds me of a time I got arrested for giving a nice old lady a bottle of water while she was waiting in line to vote in Georgia and it became a big deal. I got charged, convicted and sentenced to prison time but luckily my friend Jerry Seinfeld springs Larry out of jail after he discovers a juror broke his sequester, causing a mistrial and the sentence being thrown out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Counter-proposition: you get to choose - either you cast the vote, or you get the free burger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think the free burger would entice more people to vote than the threat of getting a burger if you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But you would remove people who would prefer burger to participating in democracy from the equation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How about a $200 tax receipt from the government itself?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Didn’t Krispy Kreme offer a free donut to anyone with an I voted sticker at one point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If they gave out monopoly pieces and gave away $1m they would have the entire working poor who don’t vote participate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I would also like to see a similar graph for mid-term elections. Do the winners even get 10% of the eligible votes?

permalink
report
reply
35 points

The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Also, sometimes it say “won” or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I’ve never understood why there is a voting system where the one with most votes can lose.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

They usually justify it by saying it’s to prevent the tyranny of the majority (two wolves and a sheep biting on dinner).

But a case could be made that it’s a way to keep the elite entrenched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Kinda makes sense. Would make more if the number of terms were the limiting factor. Two and you’re out for life. Sement that, no alleviating factors.

Who knows, maybe they even have that in place already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That rule was added in the 1950’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The founders were a gentleman’s club. Which is basically a fraternity. They made up rules that made sense to a bunch of frat boy farmers with enlightenment libraries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I wouldn’t call them farmers. Partly because a variety of wealthy professions were represented and mostly because the ones who called themselves farmers didn’t do any farming, they forced enslaved people to farm for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fair

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It was a compromise so the smaller states were willing to join the United States. Same reason there are two senators for each state.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Data Is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

Community stats

  • 894

    Monthly active users

  • 143

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments

Community moderators