Lots more good stuff with citations in the article, but this bit really ties it all together:
The right-wing obsession over racial demographics becomes obvious in the “pro-natalism” movement, which advocates for conservatives to have more children to take control of society. The mission of the movement is “to build an army of like-minded people, starting with their own children, who will reject a whole host of changes wrought by liberal democracy,” according to a fascinating recent story in Politico.
For the right wing, pro-natalism means looking for every possible means to increase the white percentage of the nation’s population. Through this lens, it’s not hard to see why Republicans remain virulently anti-immigration and strictly opposed to abortion.
Those two issues may appear unrelated, but in fact Republican positions on both stem at least in part from white demographic fears. Republicans want to halt the rise in the nonwhite population by curbing immigration. At the same time, they hope their abortion bans will boost domestic birth rates — staving off white demographic decline. They also want to ban contraceptives and no-fault divorce, forcing women to stay in marriages and have more children.
The Republican Party’s white nationalism is often justified in religious terms, since much of this agenda designed to enhance white power stems from the party’s Christian fundamentalist base. Along with Protestant evangelicals, the Republican religious base now includes fundamentalist Catholics, who stridently oppose abortion.
The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Intercept:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Search topics on Ground.News
https://theintercept.com/2024/08/10/republicans-trump-vance-racism-white-nationalism/
Racism is not the reason Trump is popular, it’s part of why he’s not popular. Obviously, a premise of the article’s argument is that Trump is popular in the first place, which is demonstrably not true. He lost two popular votes against 2 candidates who were themselves already extremely unpopular. In fact he lost so badly that of the 12 major party candidates to run in the 21st century, he came in 10th and 11th, only beating out John McCain’s 2008 chaotic performance against the popular Obama. And according to some polls, he may give McCain a run for his money this year.
So we shouldn’t be asking why Trump is popular, we should be asking why he’s unpopular. I’d argue racism is no longer popular in the US, in fact there’s been majority support among white people for interracial marriage since 1995. Trump grew up and became popular in a much more racist era than today, and that harms his popularity.
Regardless of the popular vote, racism is why he has such a rabid cult following, and it’s why he won the Republican nomination.
I think what they may be trying to say is that the majority of Trump supporters are not the rabid followers. This is why they are so dangerous. The majority of his support is not the crazy people you see on TV. They are your friends, family and coworkers, your neighbors, people you know.
Trump is selling a solution to the political corruption that nearly EVERYONE is sick of. This is what makes him popular. The people voting for him will tolerate non-direct racism but they aren’t choosing that side because of it. What you hear about from the media is the crazy people that make good stories.
And yes, Trump brings along a con-crew with their own agenda who are just as corrupt as those that Trump complains about. They’ve been scheming long before Trump, he’s just the current tool.
That and there is just a huge amount of stupid lemmings that are dumb as rocks.
Everyone including the media paint a picture that’s it’s just Trump … it’s just his followers … it’s just a political party …
None of what they are doing or saying would be possible without the full support and financing of very wealthy and rich elites… and none of it would be possible without the support and sometimes encouragement, acceptance and justification of a very pliable media, who are all owned by the same wealthy and rich elites.
He gave someone for people to hate.
