Lots more good stuff with citations in the article, but this bit really ties it all together:

 

The right-wing obsession over racial demographics becomes obvious in the “pro-natalism” movement, which advocates for conservatives to have more children to take control of society. The mission of the movement is “to build an army of like-minded people, starting with their own children, who will reject a whole host of changes wrought by liberal democracy,” according to a fascinating recent story in Politico.

For the right wing, pro-natalism means looking for every possible means to increase the white percentage of the nation’s population. Through this lens, it’s not hard to see why Republicans remain virulently anti-immigration and strictly opposed to abortion.

Those two issues may appear unrelated, but in fact Republican positions on both stem at least in part from white demographic fears. Republicans want to halt the rise in the nonwhite population by curbing immigration. At the same time, they hope their abortion bans will boost domestic birth rates — staving off white demographic decline. They also want to ban contraceptives and no-fault divorce, forcing women to stay in marriages and have more children.

The Republican Party’s white nationalism is often justified in religious terms, since much of this agenda designed to enhance white power stems from the party’s Christian fundamentalist base. Along with Protestant evangelicals, the Republican religious base now includes fundamentalist Catholics, who stridently oppose abortion.

111 points

Racism is the only reason why the entire Republican party is so popular

permalink
report
reply
97 points

LBJ nailed how the Republican party gets poor people to vote against their financial interests. It’s all hatred of the other (black people, women, gays…etc)

If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I firmly believe that every person should have that printed on a card in their pocket, and refer to it every time Trump or a Republican says something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

I think the left and the right could benefit from a little heart-to-heart chat. Each side seems to have built up a mental caricature of the other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

What the fuck about this comment made you go “noooo BOTH SIDES 😭”

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Ok.

The Right: We want women to lose their physical rights, to have immigrants all removed from the country, to ban all porn, change all non-partisan roles into Right-wing party ones, to massacre education funding, reduce climate change mitigation efforts to zero then double down on more polluting, and in general create a real-world Gilead. Also cops should be able to kill anyone they want.

The Left: We want to protect those people, and not unfund those things, a-

The Right: See, you won’t work together to help us create a white nationalist state! You’re not arguing in good faith!

The Left: Sigh Ok then, we wa-

The Right: They’re so nasty, aren’t they, the Left? So nasty! When we have their people attacked, they fight back! So violent and nasty!

The Left: We t-

The Right: Yes, focus the cameras on me, not my opponent, especially not when they’re speaking! I will create a perfect utopia of perfection like none other!

The Left: W-

The Right: And we’ll stop the illegal immoral war on Oil and Gas, while we abandon Ukraine to Russia and Palestine to Israel!

The Left: Frowning, leave to prepare the guillotines

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

While entertaining, the hypothetical conversation appears to put words in the mouths of the other side.

When I sail my ship into conservative waters, those are not the arguments that I see being made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

Interesting thought. Do you have suggestions on how to counter nationalists seizing the label “pro-natalist”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can use an alternative term like “anti-choice” while reporting on them. You can also insist on defining the term whenever you use it. “Pro- natalists, who believe that unwilling women should be forced to give birth”, something like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You don’t get to decide. Your oligarch controlled media do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

The Republican Party’s white nationalism is often justified in religious terms, since much of this agenda designed to enhance white power stems from the party’s Christian fundamentalist base.

Wait til they learn that Jesus wasn’t white

permalink
report
reply
16 points

And nothing says “love thy neighbor” like racial supremacism.

Their white supremacist, conservative, hateful, supply-side Jesus is weird. I’m an atheist but I much prefer the hippie, anti-materialist, socialist, anti-establishment Jesus I was grew up hearing about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Heh. 😀

They think an election was stolen and that climate change and covid are hoaxes, so I’m doubtful they are capable of believing that no matter what evidence was provided.

When someone believes those things, it’s probably not even the work of their conscious mind to just dismiss it out of hand when someone tells them Jesus wasn’t white.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Trump’s helicopter story is a different black dude:

“Willie is the short Black guy living in San Francisco,” Holden said. “I’m a tall Black guy living in Los Angeles.

“I guess we all look alike,” Holden told POLITICO, letting out a loud laugh.

permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

Trump’s absolutely losing it, and we’re seeing his flailing and failing brain on display more everyday.

My theory on why he thinks Kamala “was Indian” and “turned Black one day” is that he’s fully confused Nikki Haley and Kamala Harris in his brain, and has conflated the two into one person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And that’s even scarier because we’ll get rabid pro-life Vance who’s going to wage a literal war on women and childless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

His wife looks like he ate her life force

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh actually yeah maybe. Or JD Vance’s wife who is also Indian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

So, what color is Trump? White or orange? He needs to make up his mind. I’m confused.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments