Did you know? Despite claiming to block all cross-site cookies out of the box, Firefox automatically allows Google to use them in your browser should you log in to one of their services.

The browser only lets you know about this once it happens, and it’s on you to notice the permissions icon appearing in the URL bar. There is a link to a paragraph on a help page explaining this behaviour, but it seemingly goes unmentioned pretty much everywhere else on the internet.

This surprised me, especially considering Firefox’s stance on privacy. I was even more surprised that this is done without consent. If this is for usability, Firefox should at least warn the user before this happens.

223 points

Take it you didn’t click “learn more”?

To sign into YouTube, you need to sign into Google.Com. that’s the cross site script. Nothing scary, or unexpected.

permalink
report
reply
136 points

What’s with the influx of anti Firefox posts here? Really weird. Especially since yes everything is in their learn more stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

It is a bit odd that there’s an influx of anti Firefox and AMD stuff after Google and Intel were in the news for major things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yeah feels a bit intentional

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

People have been up in arms for every new “flavor of the month” browser that boasts better security, or some new privacy thing, and Firefox not offering it. Also, the freakout about Mozilla enabling “ad-tracking” was wildly misunderstood and overblown by the privacy nuts, but started a slew of these “WELLFFDIDTHISTHINGBLETRRGGHWAAAHHHHHHH”

It’s all overblown in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“flavor of the month” browser

“flavor of the month” browser Chromium

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If you’ve lost your entire user base except the privacy nuts, you should be very careful about your messaging because they’re your only demographic left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

the moment I saw login im like um yeah I bet same with microsoft or any other login that is across. wait for it. sites. login to outlook.com and then go to 0365

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But that’s one of the most dangerous trackers afaik. There should at least be an option to disable it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Don’t log into their services.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Don’t visit the websites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Don’t even use HTTP, only Gopher and BBS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Don’t even use UDP or TCP, only FCP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Bingo! This is the way. I only open chrome when I need to log into a google/ alphabet site on the unlikely occasion. And close it immediately after.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly if it can be used without logging in you don’t have to log into everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

If they wouldn’t allow this, signing into YouTube wouldn’t work

permalink
report
reply
17 points

If you access Google sites only in a special Firefox container, that still isolates your Google cookies from the rest of your tabs? Or does it just add a “you don’t get this from me” flag when it gives Google your user cookie, so it can pretend to not recognise you as it adds your web-browsing history to your ad-targeting profile (flagged appropriately as to keep it deniable, of course)?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Yes.
I have a google container for one account.
If I open a google site in another container it will be as if the account didn’t exist.
The containers are all partitioned.
You can also partition off the cookie/storage per site by proxy used (in about:config).
So, you could create a container for google account 1 using proxy 1 and another container for google account 2 using proxy 2 and they will never have access to the data stored by either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Out of curiosity, do you know if these containers also obfuscate browser and device fingerprinting? Separating cookies is important but unless it also blocks fingerprinters (in a different way for each container) the site will instantly know the same person is using both accounts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

FF doesn’t really enable full fingerprint resistance by default. But it can.

These settings are some of what I usually use. All fingerprint values (that are able to be are randomised on every reload of a page.

Set secutity setting to custom, select known AND suspected fingerprinting > select from dropdown ‘In ALL tabs’

Also: Because it’s of no value / use to me, and (IMHO) a giant gaping privacy and security issue, I also disable webgl and webrtc, and navigator completely in about:config

Set the following:

WebGL webgl.disabled true
WebGL2 webgl.enable-webgl2 false
WebRTC media.peerconnection.enabled false
Navigator media.navigator.enabled false
RFP privacy.resistFingerprinting true

RFP options like bounce protection etc can also be enabled in config.

Check fingerprints on browserleaks.com, coveryourtracks.EFF.org, etc

Should be 100% unique fingerprint every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think the “rest of your tabs” would have to be sites that already include google js (e.g. for “sign in with google” type stuff) to even know you have a google cookie (otherwise what’s the point of FPI/ETP/TCP/network partitioning/no-3rd-party-cookies/etc.), but I could be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Is it sufficient to set the Enhanced Tracking Protection to “Strict” (which claims to block cross-site cookies in all windows), or is there something else you have to do?

permalink
report
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments