https://archive.li/O1cSJ

‘Google decided that work-life balance was more important than winning’

OK Eric, but how do you win without employees?

18 points

To my ears the headline gets it backwards. He blamed remote working for the company’s AI woes, or blamed the company’s AI woes on remote working. Not sure if this is a typo or a legitimate different use of language.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

No no, he is blaming AI for the remote working. He wants the AIs to come work from the office. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed, the “on” should be “for”

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

Working from home will always be my priority over commuting for two hours. Get fucked, ex-CEO.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yes daddy 🤡

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Google’s ex-CEO blames remote working for (insert anything wrong with his business).

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Well let’s hope the FTC follows through and goes full Baby Bell on their asses

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

“I’m sorry to be so blunt,” Schmidt continued in the video posted on Stanford’s YouTube channel on Tuesday. “But the fact of the matter is, if you all leave the university and go found a company, you’re not gonna let people work from home and only come in one day a week if you want to compete against the other startups.”

If I were going to found a company I’d make it remote only because I’d have access to a global labor pool, often in places with lower cost of living, and I won’t have to pay for an office. Seems like a win-win.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I absolutely would do that, in point of fact. And, like, tons of successful startups started in a founder’s (or even founder’s parent’s) basement or garage. So I don’t know what this C-suite dipshit thinks he’s on about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

if you want to compete against the other startups

i’m guessing he offered approximately zero data to support the claim that WFH startups always lose against office-only startups?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

What an absurd statement. Absolute lunacy on his part to compare Google to a startup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He’s speaking to a bunch of Standford students and giving advice, so it’s not that absurd. But it is pretty absurd to tell potential entrepreneurs “Make sure you pay as much as possible for real estate in a big city, and then overpay for talent because your office is in a big city.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If his goal is for his company to win I wouldn’t be taking his advice.he has a financial incentive to sabotage future competition

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Talking to students at Stanford about startups is fine. Projecting his concerns about WFH employees for his own company onto them is nonsense and disingenuous, as Google is about the furthest they could possibly be from a startup nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Work Reform

!workreform@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

  • All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
  • Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
  • Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
  • We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

  • Higher wages for underpaid workers.
  • Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
  • Better and fewer working hours.
  • Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
  • Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 952

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments