I think we’re in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might
Anyway, good luck on that three front war
Let’s take a look at a comprehensive list of countries that have used nukes against others:
🇺🇲
Based on this, we conclude that the US is less likely to use nukes against others. I’m very smart
Not only that but the US spent the entirety of the Cold War trying to either use nukes again or find some way to deploy nukes to every soldier and conflict possible, with everything from nuclear demolition charges to artillery shells
Given their way the US would arm every soldier with a nuclear rifle if they could
Given their way the US would arm every soldier with a nuclear rifle if they could
the US deployed backpack-sized nuclear weapons to Europe for decades as part of a stay-behind Gladio type operation, whose intent was to detonate nukes guerilla style in a Soviet-overrun Europe
The Littlest Boy | Foreign Policy
linking an archive because this article has suspiciously been removed from FP’s website, just loads a blank page.
There was also a plan during the cold war in case of war where US would nuke every transport node in Poland (that is basically every city above 20000 inhabitants) to block Soviet and Polish armies from reinforcing East Germany. And of course it didn’t plan to bomb even East Germany itself, they are not Slavs after all.
Let’s also consider the stances of those countries on a nuclear first strike:
- China: Unambiguous “No First Use”, with no exceptions
- Iran: Doesn’t even have nukes and afaik has been cleared of ever trying to do so by international inspectors
- Russia: Reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if WMD are deployed against itself or its allies or if the very existence of the state is threatened with conventional warfare
- The US: Still has full first use.
For fun, the other countries with nukes:
- The UK: Has openly stated they will use nukes in a pre-emptive strike, officially has no stance on a “No First Use” policy in order to “keep its enemies guessing”
- Israel: Doesn’t have nukes (winkwinknudgenudge) but would 300% use them if they did
- India: No first use against states without nukes
- Pakistan: Full first use.
- North Korea: First use if they get attacked
My guess is it spikes as everyone pumps up MIC stocks and then craters when ships start sinking the next day
Extremely critical support to the engineers who made US warships touchscreen-controlled.
Man who earns living from defense spending spreads baseless fears of coming war
New talking point to get bigger defense contracts just dropped. And he has another one:
“I think we’re in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might,” he added. “Where you have technological parity but moral disparity, the actual disparity is much greater than people think.”
Karp continued: “In fact, given that we have parity technologically but we don’t have parity morally, they have a huge advantage.”
Imagine thinking the US has the moral high ground, and that having the moral high ground is a disadvantage.
He claims the West is too moral to effectively fight these opponents, who would use unscrupulous means.
Hahaha what the fuck?
It’s just pure vibes. The Middle Eastern wars never happened. Or maybe actually it was China that did all that.
The US wouldn’t stand a chance against all three at once. Delusional moron.
I recently read a super weird essay written in 2017 2007 by the other Palantir founder, Peter Thiel, called ‘The Straussian Moment’ - and it’s wild how they’re still talking about some of the exact same things.
For anyone wanting insight into the particular brand of fascism coming out of silicon valley these days, it’s worth a read.
Losing two wars simultaneously in Iraq and Afghanistan wasn’t good enough, we need to lose three instead
Eh, they accomplished their objectives (enriching the MIC and oil companies). I don’t really consider that a loss.
